Influence of Er:YAG laser on cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of composite resin restorations

被引:27
作者
Chinelatti, Michelle A. [1 ]
Ramos, Renata P. [1 ]
Chimello, Daniela T. [1 ]
Corona, Silmara A. M. [1 ]
Pecora, Jesus D. [1 ]
Dibb, Regina G. Palma [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Sch Dent, Dept Operat Dent, BR-14049 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1089/pho.2006.24.214
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess microleakage on class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser with varying surface treatment. Background Data: There has been little reported research on microleakage at cavities prepared and treated with Er:YAG laser. Methods: Fifty preparations using Er:YAG laser or a highspeed handpiece were developed. The surface treatment was performed as follows: Er:YAG laser (group 1); 35% phosphoric acid (group 2); laser + acid (group 3); finishing with low-speed + laser + acid (group 4); conventional preparation developed with a high-speed handpiece + acid (group 5-control). The samples were restored with Single Bond/Z250, thermocycled, isolated, and immersed in a 50% AgNO3 solution. The restorations were sectioned, and the microleakage was, measured in milimeters using a specific computer software. Data were analyzed employing ANOVA and Tukey test. Results: Statistical analysis showed that group 5 (G5) obtained the lowest results of microleakage (22.05%), and it was statistically. similar (p > 0.05) to G1 (37.7%) and different (p < 0.05) from the other groups (G2 = 50.4%; G3 = 43%; G4 = 44.2%). The occlusal margins (22.62%) demonstrated less microleakage (p < 0.05) than the cervical margins (56.32%). Conclusion: The use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment negatively influenced the marginal sealing of composite resin restorations.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 218
页数:5
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
LASER AND DENTAL PULP [J].
ADRIAN, JC ;
BERNIER, JL ;
SPRAGUE, WG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1971, 83 (01) :113-+
[2]
Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro [J].
Aoki, A ;
Ishikawa, I ;
Yamada, T ;
Otsuki, M ;
Watanabe, H ;
Tagami, J ;
Ando, Y ;
Yamamoto, H .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 (06) :1404-1414
[3]
ENAMEL SURFACE-ROUGHNESS ANALYSIS AFTER LASER ABLATION AND ACID-ETCHING [J].
ARCORIA, CJ ;
LIPPAS, MG ;
VITASEK, BA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1993, 20 (02) :213-224
[4]
MICROSCOPIC INVESTIGATION OF ADAPTATION OF SOME PLASTIC FILLING MATERIALS TO DENTAL CAVITY WALLS [J].
ASMUSSEN, E ;
JORGENSEN, KD .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1972, 30 (01) :3-+
[5]
BARNES DM, 1994, OPER DENT, V19, P133
[6]
Ben-Amar A, 1989, Am J Dent, V2, P175
[7]
WET VERSUS DRY ENAMEL ABLATION BY ER-YAG LASER [J].
BURKES, EJ ;
HOKE, J ;
GOMES, E ;
WOLBARSHT, M .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 67 (06) :847-851
[8]
Bonding to Er-YAG-laser-treated dentin [J].
Ceballos, L ;
Toledano, M ;
Osorio, R ;
Tay, FR ;
Marshall, GW .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 (02) :119-122
[9]
Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments [J].
Ceballos, L ;
Osorio, R ;
Toledano, M ;
Marshall, GW .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2001, 17 (04) :340-346
[10]
Corona SAM, 2001, OPER DENT, V26, P491