Using Nonnaive Participants Can Reduce Effect Sizes

被引:125
作者
Chandler, Jesse [1 ,2 ]
Paolacci, Gabriele [3 ]
Peer, Eyal [4 ]
Mueller, Pam [5 ]
Ratliff, Kate A. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[2] Math Policy Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Bar Ilan Univ, Grad Sch Business Adm, IL-52100 Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[6] Univ Florida, Dept Psychol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
nonnaivete; repeated participation; effect sizes; judgment and decision making; panel conditioning; research methods; open data; open materials; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; MECHANICAL TURK; PSYCHOLOGY; JUDGMENTS; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1177/0956797615585115
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although researchers often assume their participants are naive to experimental materials, this is not always the case. We investigated how prior exposure to a task affects subsequent experimental results. Participants in this study completed the same set of 12 experimental tasks at two points in time, first as a part of the Many Labs replication project and again a few days, a week, or a month later. Effect sizes were markedly lower in the second wave than in the first. The reduction was most pronounced when participants were assigned to a different condition in the second wave. We discuss the methodological implications of these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1139
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1941, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V5, P91
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, APPL SOCIAL RES METH
[3]   How to show that 9 > 221: Collect judgments in a between-subjects design [J].
Birnbaum, MH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1999, 4 (03) :243-249
[4]   Nonnaivete among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers [J].
Chandler, Jesse ;
Mueller, Pam ;
Paolacci, Gabriele .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (01) :112-130
[5]   Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design [J].
Charness, Gary ;
Gneezy, Uri ;
Kuhn, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 81 (01) :1-8
[6]   Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Buchner, Axel ;
Lang, Albert-Georg .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :1149-1160
[7]   AMBIGUITY AVERSION AND COMPARATIVE IGNORANCE [J].
FOX, CR ;
TVERSKY, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (03) :585-603
[8]   SURVEYS ON SURVEYS - LIMITATIONS AND POTENTIALITIES [J].
GOYDER, J .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1986, 50 (01) :27-41
[9]   WITHIN-SUBJECTS DESIGNS - TO USE OR NOT TO USE [J].
GREENWALD, AG .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1976, 83 (02) :314-320
[10]   Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test [J].
Greenwald, AG ;
McGhee, DE ;
Schwartz, JLK .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (06) :1464-1480