Selecting a CDM investor in China: A critical analysis

被引:30
作者
Maraseni, Tek Narayan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Queensland, Australian Ctr Sustainable Catchments, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
关键词
Climate change mitigation; Critical factors; Developing countries; VENTURE CAPITALISTS EVALUATIONS; START-UP TEAMS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Kyoto Protocol adopted three flexible market-based mechanisms (Emissions Trading; Joint Implementation; Clean Development Mechanism) to meet emission reduction targets in a cost-effective manner. Of these, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is the only mechanism that links developed and developing countries. China has been a dominant player in CDM markets with >50.86% of the world's 4768 CDM projects. This study surveyed key CDM stakeholders from which the identification and ranking of the 10 most important factors that determine the selection of CDM investors in China. The most important factors were "reputation of company" and "experience in CDM project in China" whilst "personal friendship or relationship" was the least influential. European countries (mainly UK, The Netherlands, Sweden and Germany) are the major investors and have both strong reputations in the CDM arena in addition to having assisted China in capacity development activities for CDM in early 2000. An understanding of these selection factors that potential CDM hosts use in their joint venture decisions should benefit CDM investors. This knowledge should also provide the policy and strategic level framework for future potential CDM hosts in other developing countries. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 489
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, STAT TRENDS CARB MAR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, STATE AND TRENDS IN THE CARBON MARKET 2009
  • [3] [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG CARB MARK
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, CLEAN DEV MECH POA 7
  • [5] DC (Department of Climate Change), 2012, CLEAN DEV MECH CHIN
  • [6] Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures
    Delmar, F
    Shane, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2004, 19 (03) : 385 - 410
  • [7] Venture capitalists' evaluations of start-up teams: Trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience
    Franke, Nikolaus
    Gruber, Marc
    Harhoff, Dietmar
    Henkel, Joachim
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2008, 32 (03) : 459 - 483
  • [8] What you are is what you like - similarity biases in venture capitalists' evaluations of start-up teams
    Franke, Nikolaus
    Gruber, Marc
    Harhoff, Dietmar
    Henkel, Joachim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2006, 21 (06) : 802 - 826
  • [9] Why some awards are more effective signals of quality than others: A study of movie awards
    Gemser, Gerda
    Leenders, Mark A. A. M.
    Wijnberg, Nachoem M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2008, 34 (01) : 25 - 54
  • [10] VENTURE CAPITALISTS DECISION CRITERIA IN NEW VENTURE EVALUATION
    HALL, J
    HOFER, CW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 1993, 8 (01) : 25 - 42