Effects of Mussel Processing Solis on the Adherence of Listeria monocytogenes to Polypropylene and Stainless Steel

被引:17
作者
Saa, P. [1 ]
Cabo, M. L. [1 ]
Rodriguez, J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Inst Invest Marinas, Vigo 36208, Pontevedra, Spain
关键词
BIOFILM FORMATION; ATTACHMENT; ADHESION; STRAINS; GROWTH; TEMPERATURE; RESISTANCE; ADSORPTION; MOTILITY; SURFACES;
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X-72.9.1885
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
A comparative study of adhesion kinetics of L. monocytogenes (strains CECT 5873, CECT 936, CECT 911, and CECT 4032, representing serotypes 1/2a, 1/2b, 1/2c, and 4b, respectively) to polypropylene (PP) and stainless steel (SS) under two surface contamination conditions in plants processing cooked mussel was carried out. The conditions were either (i) contamination of clean surfaces with mussel cooking juice carrying L. monocytogenes or (ii) contamination with L. monocytogenes after soiling with mussel cooking juice, i.e., conditioning film (CF). The kinetics of adhesion were successfully described by a modified logistic model. Adhesion to PP was higher than to SS in all strains, except CECT 5873. Adhesion was initially higher in the presence of CF, but numbers of adherent cells decreased sharply in the late phase of study in three of eight cases as a result of cell detachment. Combinations of strain, surface material, and surface conditioning where adhesion was most enhanced were defined as the worst-case scenarios (CECT 911-PP, 4032-PP-CF, 5873-SS, and 4032-SS-CF). Subsequently, adhesion in worst-case scenarios was compared with a similar contamination event taking place in plants processing live mussels, using intervalvar water of mussel as a food residue matrix. Adhesion levels were higher in intervalvar water than in cooking juice, especially in both cases with no CF; this was attributed to more space available for adhesion or to physicochemical conditions enhancing cells to adhere.
引用
收藏
页码:1885 / 1890
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Variation in biofilm formation among strains of Listeria monocytogenes [J].
Borucki, MK ;
Peppin, JD ;
White, D ;
Loge, F ;
Call, DR .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 69 (12) :7336-7342
[2]   A method for bacteriocin quantification [J].
Cabo, ML ;
Murado, MA ;
González, MP ;
Pastoriza, L .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 87 (06) :907-914
[3]   Effects of physicochemical surface characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes strains on attachment to glass [J].
Chae, MS ;
Schraft, H ;
Hansen, LT ;
Mackereth, R .
FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 23 (03) :250-259
[4]   Comparative evaluation of adhesion and biofilm formation of different Listeria monocytogenes strains [J].
Chae, MS ;
Schraft, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 62 (1-2) :103-111
[5]   Listeria monocytogenes LO28:: Surface physicochemical properties and ability to form biofilms at different temperatures and growth phases [J].
Chavant, P ;
Martinie, B ;
Meylheuc, T ;
Bellon-Fontaine, MN ;
Hebraud, M .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 68 (02) :728-737
[6]  
Chmielewski R A N, 2003, Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, V2, P22, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00012.x
[7]  
COX L J, 1989, Food Microbiology (London), V6, P49, DOI 10.1016/S0740-0020(89)80037-1
[8]  
Cunliffe D, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P4995
[9]  
Denny J, 2008, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V13
[10]   Influence of temperature on biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on various food-contact surfaces:: relationship with motility and cell surface hydrophobicity [J].
Di Bonaventura, G. ;
Piccolomini, R. ;
Paludi, D. ;
D'Orio, V. ;
Vergara, A. ;
Conter, M. ;
Ianieri, A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 104 (06) :1552-1561