Do characteristics of HIPAA consent forms affect the response rate?

被引:9
作者
Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana
Clarridge, Brian R.
Fowler, Floyd J., Jr.
Weissman, Joel S.
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Survey Res Ctr, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Hlth Policy, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
consent forms; HIPAA; health-protected information; response rate; HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH; INFORMED-CONSENT; QUALITY; IMPROVE; PRIVACY;
D O I
10.1097/01.mlr.0000241062.79855.35
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Under the The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule, researchers are required to obtain written authorization from patients to gain access to protected health information. The purpose of this research was to examine how the characteristics of authorization forms used by hospitals affect the likelihood of consent. Method: This work reports on a recent telephone survey (administered January to August 2004) of previously hospitalized patients from 16 Massachusetts hospitals. Respondents were asked to provide authorization for review of their medical records. Those respondents who agreed over the phone to be mailed authorization forms were sent a copy of their hospital's form and were asked to sign and return it. Measured characteristics of the forms included number of pages, number of fields, distinctness of institution's name, whether a witness was required, and requirement of Social Security Number (SSN). Results: We received 1021 signed forms (50.3% of all sent forms). The likelihood of return was affected by the requirement of the SSN, the clarity of the hospital name, and providing an extra copy for respondents' records. In logistic regression analysis, besides age and gender, only the SSN and clarity of the hospital name identification were significant. Conclusion: Forms should be clear about the institution from which they come, easy to understand, and should not ask for SSN or other highly sensitive information unrelated to health care.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 103
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] HIPAA regulations - A new era of medical-record privacy?
    Annas, GJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (15) : 1486 - 1490
  • [2] Potential impact of the HIPAA privacy rule on data collection in a registry of patients with acute coronary syndrome
    Armstrong, D
    Kline-Rogers, E
    Jani, SM
    Goldman, EB
    Fang, JM
    Mukherjee, D
    Nallamothu, BK
    Eagle, KA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (10) : 1125 - 1129
  • [3] Bates N. A., 2005, ASA P, P3786
  • [4] Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research - A systematic review
    Flory, J
    Emanuel, E
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (13): : 1593 - 1601
  • [5] Results of the national initiative for cancer care quality: How can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States?
    Malin, JL
    Schneider, EC
    Epstein, AM
    Adams, J
    Emanuel, EJ
    Kahn, KL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (04) : 626 - 634
  • [6] Do patient consent procedures affect participation rates in health services research?
    Nelson, K
    Garcia, RE
    Brown, J
    Mangione, CM
    Louis, TA
    Keeler, E
    Cretin, S
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (04) : 283 - 288
  • [7] CONFIDENTIALITY ASSURANCES AND RESPONSE - A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW OF THE EXPERIMENTAL LITERATURE
    SINGER, E
    VONTHURN, DR
    MILLER, ER
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1995, 59 (01) : 66 - 77
  • [9] Selection bias from requiring patients to give consent to examine data for health services research
    Woolf, SH
    Rothemich, SF
    Johnson, RE
    Marsland, DW
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2000, 9 (10) : 1111 - 1118
  • [10] MED PRIVACY NATL STA