Magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial

被引:219
作者
Temkin, Nancy R.
D Anderson, Gail
Winn, H. Richard
Ellenbogen, Richard G.
Britz, Gavin W.
Schuster, James
Lucas, Timothy
Newell, David W.
Mansfield, Pamela Nelson
Machamer, Joan E.
Barber, Jason
Dikmen, Sureyya S.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Pharm, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] CUNY Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg & Neurosci, New York, NY 10029 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Swedish Med Ctr, Seattle Neurosci Inst, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70630-5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Traumatic brain injuries represent an important and costly health problem. Supplemental magnesium positively affects many of the processes involved in secondary injury after traumatic brain injury and consistently improves outcome in animal models. We aimed to test whether treatment with magnesium favourably affects outcome in head-injured patients. Methods In a double-blind trial, 499 patients aged 14 years or older admitted to a level 1 regional trauma Centre between August, 1998, and October, 2004, with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury were randomly assigned one of two doses of magnesium or placebo within 8 h of injury and continuing for 5 days. Magnesium doses were targeted to achieve serum magnesium ranges of 1.0-1.85 mmol/L or 1.25-2.5 mmol/L. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality, seizures, functional measures, and neuropsychological tests assessed up to 6 months after injury. Analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00004730. Findings Magnesium showed no significant positive effect on the composite primary outcome measure at the higher dose (mean=55 average percentile ranking on magnesium vs 52 on placebo, 95% CI for difference -7 to 14; p=0.70). Those randomly assigned magnesium at the lower dose did significantly worse than those assigned placebo (48 vs 54, 95% CI -10.5 to -2; p=0.007). Furthermore, there was higher mortality with the higher magnesium dose than with placebo. Other major medical complications were similar between groups, except for a slight excess of pulmonary oedema and respiratory failure in the lower magnesium target group. No subgroups were identified in which magnesium had a significantly positive effect. Interpretation Continuous infusions of magnesium for 5 days given to patients within 8 h of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury were not neuroprotective and might even have a negative effect in the treatment of significant head injury.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 38
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1975, Nonparametrics: statistical methods based on ranks
[2]   Postinjury treatment with magnesium chloride attenuates cortical damage after traumatic brain injury in rats [J].
Bareyre, FM ;
Saatman, KE ;
Raghupathi, R ;
McIntosh, TK .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2000, 17 (11) :1029-1039
[3]   Dynamic changes in N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors after closed head injury in mice:: Implications for treatment of neurological and cognitive deficits [J].
Biegon, A ;
Fry, PA ;
Paden, CM ;
Alexandrovich, A ;
Tsenter, J ;
Shohami, E .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (14) :5117-5122
[4]   Acute treatment with MgSO4 attenuates long-term hippocampal tissue loss after brain trauma in the rat [J].
Browne, KD ;
Leoni, MJ ;
Iwata, A ;
Chen, XH ;
Smith, DH .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2004, 77 (06) :878-883
[5]   Guidelines for the management of severe head injury [J].
Bullock, MR ;
Povlishock, JT .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 1996, 13 (11) :641-641
[6]   SELECTIVE REMINDING FOR ANALYSIS OF MEMORY AND LEARNING [J].
BUSCHKE, H .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1973, 12 (05) :543-550
[7]  
COLLINS R, 1995, LANCET, V345, P669
[8]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[9]   Functional status examination: A new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury [J].
Dikmen, S ;
Machamer, J ;
Miller, B ;
Doctor, J ;
Temkin, N .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2001, 18 (02) :127-140
[10]  
GENNARELLI T, 1997, R49CCR303687 CDCP