American Indians, hunting and fishing rates, risk, and the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory

被引:29
作者
Burger, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Nat Resources, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci Inst, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/enrs.1998.3923
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hunting fishing, and recreational rates of 276 American Indians attending a festival at Fort Hall, near the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), were examined. Nearly half of the sample lived on the Fort Hall Reservation, and half were American Indians from elsewhere in the western United States. An additional 44 White people attending the festival were also interviewed. The hypothesis that there are differences in hunting, fishing, and recreational rates as a function of tribal affiliation, educational level, gender, and age was examined. Information on hunting and fishing rates are central for understanding potential exposure scenarios for American Indians if the Department of Energy's INEEL lands are ever opened to pubic access, and the data are important because of the existence of tribal treaties that govern the legal and cultural rights of the Shoshone-Bannock regarding INEEL lands. Variations in hunting, fishing, and photography rates were explained by tribal affiliation (except fishing), gender, age, and schooling, Hunting rates were significantly higher for Indians (both those living on Fort Hall and others) than Whites. Men engaged in significantly higher rates of outdoor activities than women (except for photography). Potential and current hunting and fishing on and adjacent to INEEL was more similar among the local Whites and Fort Hall Indians than between these two groups and other American Indians. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 329
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Black environmentalism in the local community context [J].
Arp, W ;
Kenny, C .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1996, 28 (03) :267-282
[2]   POLITICS AND SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE - SCIENTISTS, RISK PERCEPTION, AND NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY [J].
BARKE, RP ;
JENKINSSMITH, HC .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1993, 13 (04) :425-439
[3]   THE POLITICS OF POLLUTION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE BLACK-COMMUNITY [J].
BULLARD, RD ;
WRIGHT, BH .
PHYLON, 1986, 47 (01) :71-78
[4]   Risk perception, federal spending, and the Savannah River Site: Attitudes of hunters and fishermen [J].
Burger, J ;
Sanchez, J ;
Gibbons, JW ;
Gochfeld, M .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1997, 17 (03) :313-320
[5]  
Burger J, 1997, J TOXICOL ENV HEALTH, V52, P269, DOI 10.1080/009841097159692
[6]   AN EXAMINATION OF GENDER DIFFERENCES IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENT RISK PERCEPTION [J].
DEJOY, DM .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1992, 24 (03) :237-246
[7]   GENDER, RACE, AND PERCEPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH RISKS [J].
FLYNN, J ;
SLOVIC, P ;
MERTZ, CK .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) :1101-1108
[8]   WHAT IS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT [J].
GRUMBINE, RE .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1994, 8 (01) :27-38
[9]   GENDER-SPECIFIC REACTIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS IN THE NETHERLANDS [J].
GUTTELING, JM ;
WIEGMAN, O .
SEX ROLES, 1993, 28 (7-8) :433-447
[10]  
Huffman James L., 1992, U COLO L REV, V63, P901