Etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin (VIP) plus concurrent radiation therapy for previously untreated limited small cell lung (SCM): a Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) phase II cancer study

被引:17
作者
Hanna, N
Ansari, R
Fisher, W
Shen, JZ
Jung, SH
Sandler, A
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Michiana Hem Onc, South Bend, IN 46617 USA
[3] Med Consultants, Muncie, IN 47303 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Dept Biostat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Vanderbilt Clin 1956, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
small cell lung cancer; limited stage; VIP; concurrent radiation;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-5002(01)00429-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Results of a previous Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) study revealed a small survival advantage for VIP versus etoposide and cisplatin (EP) for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This phase II study evaluated VIP with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited stage SCLC. Eligible patients had a Karnofsky Performance Score greater than or equal to50, no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and adequate end organ function. Fifty-three patients were entered. Radiotherapy was given as a daily fraction of 1.8 Gy, five fractions per week for 5 weeks for a total dose of 45 Gy, beginning on day 1 of VIP. The first 13 patients received etoposide 75 mg/m(2), cisplatin 20 mg/m(2), and ifosfamide 1.2 g/m(2) on days 1-4 with Mesna every 3 weeks for four cycles unless the patient demonstrated disease progression or undue toxicity. Excessive toxicity was seen in the first 13 patients; therefore, VIP was modified by deleting the 4th day for all subsequent patients. The major toxicity in this trial was myelosuppression. Grade 3/4 anemia, granulocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia. occurred in 38, 75, and 34% of patients, respectively. There were four treatment-related deaths [three patients (23%) on the 4-day regimen and one patient (2.5%) on the 3-day regimen]. Twenty-five patients (47.2%) achieved a CR and 11 patients (20.8%) had a PR for an overall response rate of 68%. Minimum follow up for all patients is 5 years. Overall, 46 of 53 patients have died. Median, 1, 2 and 5 year overall survival for the entire group is 15.1 months, 69.8, 35.9, and 13.2, respectively. The results of this phase II trial of VIP with concurrent early thoracic radiotherapy failed to demonstrate a superior response rate over other series utilizing EP. In addition, treatment-related morbidity and mortality appears to be unacceptably high with the VIP regimen. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 297
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   INITIAL CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC DOSES AND SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH LIMITED SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
ARRIAGADA, R ;
LECHEVALIER, T ;
PIGNON, JP ;
RIVIERE, A ;
MONNET, I ;
CHOMY, P ;
TUCHAIS, C ;
TARAYRE, M ;
RUFFIE, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (25) :1848-1852
[2]  
BIRCH R, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, pA490
[3]   Phase III comparison of twice-daily split-course irradiation versus once-daily irradiation for patients with limited stage small-cell lung carcinoma [J].
Bonner, JA ;
Sloan, JA ;
Shanahan, TG ;
Brooks, BJ ;
Marks, RS ;
Krook, JE ;
Gerstner, JB ;
Maksymiuk, A ;
Levitt, R ;
Mailliard, JA ;
Tazelaar, HD ;
Hillman, S ;
Jett, JR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) :2681-2691
[4]  
Bunn PA, 1997, SEMIN ONCOL, V24, pS7
[5]   GEMCITABINE IS AN ACTIVE NEW AGENT IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED EXTENSIVE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER (SCLC) - A STUDY OF THE NATIONAL-CANCER-INSTITUTE-OF-CANADA CLINICAL-TRIALS GROUP [J].
CORMIER, Y ;
EISENHAUER, E ;
MULDAL, A ;
GREGG, R ;
AYOUB, J ;
GOSS, G ;
STEWART, D ;
TARASOFF, P ;
WONG, D .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) :283-285
[6]  
EINHORN LH, 1985, J CLIN ONCOL, V3, P1471
[7]   Dose-intensive therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: Long-term outcome [J].
Elias, A ;
Ibrahim, J ;
Skarin, AT ;
Wheeler, C ;
McCauley, M ;
Ayash, L ;
Richardson, P ;
Schnipper, L ;
Antman, KH ;
Frei, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (04) :1175-1184
[8]   RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, DOXORUBICIN, AND VINCRISTINE VERSUS CISPLATIN AND ETOPOSIDE VERSUS ALTERNATION OF THESE REGIMENS IN SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
FUKUOKA, M ;
FURUSE, K ;
SAIJO, N ;
NISHIWAKI, Y ;
IKEGAMI, H ;
TAMURA, T ;
SHIMOYAMA, M ;
SUEMASU, K .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1991, 83 (12) :855-861
[9]   TREATMENT OF LIMITED SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER WITH CONCURRENT ETOPOSIDE CISPLATIN AND RADIOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY INTENSIFICATION WITH HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY [J].
GOODMAN, GE ;
CROWLEY, J ;
LIVINGSTON, RB ;
RIVKIN, SE ;
ALBAIN, K ;
MCCULLOCH, JH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (03) :453-457
[10]   Cancer statistics, 2000 [J].
Greenlee, RT ;
Murray, T ;
Bolden, S ;
Wingo, PA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2000, 50 (01) :7-33