Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?

被引:85
作者
David, Paul A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shapiro, Joseph S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Econ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Oxford All Souls Coll, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[3] UNU Merit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Open-source software; FLOSS projects; Community-based peer production; Population heterogeneity; Micro-motives; Motivational profiles; Web-cast surveys; Hierarchical cluster analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.10.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper seeks to close an empirical gap regarding the motivations, personal attributes and behavioral patterns among free/fibre and open-source (FLOSS) developers, especially those involved in community-based production, and considers the bearing of its findings on the existing literature and the future directions for research. Respondents to an extensive web-survey's (FLOSS-US 2003) questions about their reasons for beginning to work FLOSS are classified according to their distinct "motivational profiles" by hierarchical cluster analysis. Over half of them also are matched to projects of known membership sizes, revealing that although some members from each of the clusters are present in the small, medium and large ranges of the distribution of project sizes, the mixing fractions for the large and the very small project ranges are statistically different. Among developers who changed projects, there is a discernable flow from the bottom toward the very small towards to large projects. some of which is motivated by individuals seeking to improve their programming skills. It is found that the profile of early motivation, along with other individual attributes, significantly affects individual developers' selections of projects from different regions of the size range. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 398
页数:35
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 1 MONDAY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CATHEDRAL BAZAAR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PERSPECTIVES FREE OP
[4]   Coase's penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm [J].
Benkler, Y .
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 2002, 112 (03) :369-+
[5]   The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom [J].
Cropf, Robert A. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2008, 26 (02) :259-261
[6]   Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Mullainathan, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (02) :67-72
[7]  
BITZER J, 2004, 200419 FREIEN U
[8]  
BONACCORSI A, 2004, ALTRUISTIC IND UNPUB
[9]   THE LAW OF FAMILY INTERACTION [J].
Bossard, James H. S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1945, 50 (04) :292-294
[10]  
*BOST CONS GROUP, 2003, BOST CONS GROUP OSDN