Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: Effects of parity on obstetric risk factors

被引:107
作者
Babinszki, A [1 ]
Kerenyi, T [1 ]
Torok, O [1 ]
Grazi, V [1 ]
Lapinski, RH [1 ]
Berkowitz, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Maternal Fetal Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
grand multipara; great-grand multipara; risk factors;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70511-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare obstetric and neonatal complications among great-grand multiparous, grand multiparous, and multiparous women. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred thirty-three great-grand multiparas, 314 grand multiparas, and 2195 multiparas who were delivered of their infants between 1988 and 1998 were selected for the study. To facilitate comparison, the patients were all >35 years old and had similar socioeconomic characteristics. RESULTS: The incidence of malpresentation at the time of delivery, maternal obesity, anemia, preterm delivery, and meconium-stained amniotic fluid increased with higher parity, whereas the rate of excessive weight gain and cesarean delivery decreased. Compared with grand multiparas, great-grand multiparas had significantly elevated risks for abnormal amounts of amniotic fluid, abruptio placentae, neonatal tachypnea, and malformations but lower rates of placenta previa (P < .05). The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, preeclampsia, placenta previa, macrosomia, postdate pregnancy, and low Apgar scores was significantly higher in grand multiparas than in multiparas, whereas the proportion of induction, forceps delivery, and total labor complications was significantly lower than in the multiparous group (P < .05). Similar frequency of maternal diabetes, infection, uterine wall scar rupture, variations in fetal heart rate, fetal death, and neonatal mortality was found in the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Both high-parity groups have their own risk factors, but the rate or some complications decreases with higher parity. In addition, perinatal mortality remains low in these patients, and therefore, under satisfactory socioeconomic and health care conditions, high parity should not be considered dangerous.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 674
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Great grand multiparity: is it a risk? [J].
Abu-Heija, AT ;
Chalabi, HE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1997, 59 (03) :213-216
[2]   GRAND MULTIPARITY AS AN OBSTETRIC RISK FACTOR - A PROSPECTIVE CASE-CONTROL STUDY [J].
BRUNNER, J ;
MELANDER, E ;
KROOKBRANDT, M ;
THOMASSEN, PA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1992, 47 (03) :201-205
[3]   OBSTETRIC PERFORMANCE OF GRAND MULTIPARA [J].
CHANGE, A ;
LARKIN, P ;
ESLER, EJ ;
CONDIE, R ;
MORRISON, J .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1977, 1 (10) :330-332
[4]   THE GRANDMULTIPARA - IS SHE STILL A RISK [J].
EIDELMAN, AI ;
KAMAR, R ;
SCHIMMEL, MS ;
BARON, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (02) :389-392
[5]   THE GRAND MULTIPARA IN MODERN OBSTETRICS [J].
EVALDSON, GR .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1990, 30 (04) :217-223
[6]   RISK-FACTORS IN EXTREME GRAND MULTIPARITY [J].
FAYED, HM ;
ABID, SF ;
STEVENS, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1993, 41 (01) :17-22
[7]   THE GRAND MULTIPARA - IS IT A PROBLEM - A REVIEW OF 5785 CASES [J].
FUCHS, K ;
PERETZ, BA ;
MARCOVICI, R ;
PALDI, E ;
TIMORTRITSH, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1985, 23 (04) :321-325
[8]   THE GRAND MULTIPARA [J].
GOLDMAN, GA ;
KAPLAN, B ;
NERI, A ;
HECHTRESNICK, R ;
HAREL, L ;
OVADIA, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1995, 61 (02) :105-109
[9]   OBSTETRIC BEHAVIOR OF GRAND MULTIPARA [J].
ISRAEL, SL ;
BLAZAR, AS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1965, 91 (03) :326-&
[10]   The clinical outcome in pregnancies of grand grand multiparous women [J].
Juntunen, K ;
Kirkinen, P ;
Kauppila, A .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 76 (08) :755-759