Development of a low-carbon indicator system for China

被引:84
作者
Price, Lynn [1 ]
Zhou, Nan [1 ]
Fridley, David [1 ]
Ohshita, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Hongyou [1 ]
Zheng, Nina [1 ]
Fino-Chen, Cecilia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Energy Anal & Environm Impacts Dept, China Energy Grp,Environm Energy Technol Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ San Francisco, Dept Environm Sci & Management, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
关键词
Low carbon; China; Indicators; Energy efficiency; Carbon emissions mitigation;
D O I
10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.009
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In 2009, China committed to reducing its carbon dioxide intensity (CO2/unit of gross domestic product, GDP) by 40-45% by 2020 from a s2005 baseline and in March 2011, China's 12th Five-Year Plan established a carbon intensity reduction goal of 17% between 2011 and 2015. The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) of China then established a Low Carbon City policy and announced the selection of 5 provinces and 8 cities to pilot the low carbon development work. How to determine if a city or province is "low carbon" has not been defined by the Chinese government. Macro-level indicators of low carbon development, such as energy use or CO2 emissions per unit of GDP or per capita may be too aggregated to be meaningful measurements of whether a city or province is truly "low carbon". Instead, indicators based on energy end-use sectors (industry, residential, commercial, transport, electric power) offer a better approach for defining "low carbon" and for taking action to reduce energy-related carbon emissions. This report presents and tests a methodology for the development of a low carbon indicator system at the provincial and city level, providing initial results for an end-use low carbon indicator system, based on data available at the provincial and municipal levels. The report begins with a discussion of macro-level indicators that are typically used for inter-city, regional, or inter-country comparisons. It then turns to a discussion of the methodology used to develop a more robust low carbon indicator for China. The report presents the results of this indicator with examples for 6 selected provinces and cities in China (Beijing, Shanghai, Shanxi, Shandong, Guangdong, and Hubei). The report concludes with a discussion of data issues and other problems encountered during the development of the end-use low carbon indicator, followed by recommendations for future improvement. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 21
页数:18
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Anhua Z., 2006, EFFICIENCY IMPROVEME
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CHINA ENERGY STAT YB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, V3
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CHIN STAT YB 2010
[5]  
Carbon Disclosure Project, 2011, CDP CIT 2011 GLOB RE
[6]  
City of New York, 2011, INV NEW YORK CIT GRE
[7]  
Economist Intelligence Unit, 2009, EUR GREEN CIT IND
[8]  
Economist Intelligence Unit, 2011, AS GREEN CIT IND
[9]  
Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2004, EM GREENH GAS US 200
[10]  
Fridley D., 2011, LBNL4600E