Efficacy of mirtazapine for prevention of depressive relapse: A placebo-controlled double-blind trial of recently remitted high-risk patients

被引:58
作者
Thase, ME
Nierenberg, AA
Keller, MB
Panagides, J
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Western Psychiat Inst & Clin, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Dept Psychiat, Butler Hosp, Providence, RI USA
[4] Organon Inc, W Orange, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.4088/JCP.v62n1006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: The necessity of antidepressant continuation-phase therapy following acute-phase response has resulted in the need to characterize the longer-term efficacy and safety of all new medications. Previous studies using "extension" protocols suggest that mirtazapine has sustained antidepressant effects. The current study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of up to I year of mirtazapine therapy, using a more rigorous, randomized, placebo-controlled discontinuation design. Method: An intent-to-treat sample of 410 patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for moderate-to-severe recurrent or chronic major depressive episodes began 8 to 12 weeks of open-label therapy with mirtazapine (flexibly titrated, 15-45 mg/day). Thereafter, 156 fully remitted patients (according to Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scores) were randomly assigned to receive 40 weeks of double-blind continuation-phase therapy with either mirtazapine or placebo. Results: Mirtazapine therapy reduced the rate of depressive relapse by more than half, with 43.8% of patients relapsing on treatment with placebo as compared with 19.7% of the mirtazapine-treated patients. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 11.8% for active mirtazapine therapy versus 2.5% for placebo. Although weight gain was significantly greater in the group receiving active medication during the double-blind phase (p = .001), patients taking mirtazapine gained only 1.4 kg (3.1 lb) across the 40 weeks of continuation therapy, and there was no difference in the rates of weight gain as a new-onset adverse event. Conclusion: Continuation-phase therapy with mirtazapine is effective and well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 788
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Am J Psychiatry, V157, P1
[2]  
Breslow NE, 1980, STAT METHODS CANC RE, V1, DOI DOI 10.1097/00002030-199912240-00009
[3]  
Cox D. R., 1984, ANAL SURVIVAL DATA
[4]   Maintenance strategies for unipolar depression: an observational study of levels of treatment and recurrence [J].
Dawson, R ;
Lavori, PW ;
Coryell, WH ;
Endicott, J ;
Keller, MB .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1998, 49 (01) :31-44
[5]  
deBoer T, 1996, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V57, P19
[6]  
FAVA GA, 1994, AM J PSYCHIAT, V151, P1295
[7]  
Guy W., 1976, ECDEU ASSESSMENT MAN, P217, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.BIOPHA.2016.11.034
[8]   A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION [J].
HAMILTON, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1960, 23 (01) :56-62
[9]   Clinical efficacy of mirtazapine: A review of meta-analyses of pooled data [J].
Kasper, S .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 10 :25-35
[10]   Implications of failing to achieve successful long-term maintenance treatment of recurrent unipolar major depression [J].
Keller, MB ;
Boland, RJ .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 44 (05) :348-360