Performance evaluation: An integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations

被引:100
作者
Wu, Desheng Dash [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Joseph L Rotman Sch Management, Toronto, ON M5S 3E6, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, RiskLab, Toronto, ON M5S 3E6, Canada
关键词
Performance evaluation; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Preference relations; Cross evaluation; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; CONSISTENCY; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In it multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) context, the decision maker needs to provide his preferences over a set of decision alternatives and constructs a preference relation and then use the derived priority vector of the preference to rank various alternatives. This paper proposes in integrated approach to rate decision alternatives using data envelopment analysis and preference relations. This proposed approach includes three stages. First, pairwise efficiency scores are computed using two DEA models: the CCR model and the proposed cross-evaluation DEA model. Second, the pairwise efficiency scores are then utilized to construct the fuzzy preference relation and the consistent fuzzy preference relation. Third, by use of the row wise summation technique, we yield it priority vector, which is used for ranking decision-making units (DMUs). For the case of it single output and a single input, the preference relation can be directly obtained from the original sample data. The proposed approach is validated by two numerical examples. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 235
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model [J].
Anderson, TR ;
Hollingsworth, K ;
Inman, L .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2002, 17 (03) :249-255
[2]   APPROACHES TO CONSISTENCY ADJUSTMENT [J].
BLANKMEYER, E .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1987, 54 (03) :479-488
[3]  
BRYSON N, 1995, J OPER RES SOC, V46, P641, DOI 10.2307/2584536
[4]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[5]  
Charnes A., 1962, Nav Res Logist Q, V9, P181, DOI [10.1002/nav.3800090303, DOI 10.1002/NAV.3800090303]
[6]   Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations [J].
Chiclana, F. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. ;
Alonso, S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (01) :383-399
[7]   Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations [J].
Chiclana, F ;
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 122 (02) :277-291
[8]  
Cooper W.W., 2000, Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software
[9]   A NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT MATRICES [J].
CRAWFORD, G ;
WILLIAMS, C .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 29 (04) :387-405
[10]  
DOYLE J, 1994, J OPER RES SOC, V45, P567, DOI 10.1038/sj/jors/0450509