How can we improve adherence to blood pressure-lowering medication in ambulatory care? Systematic review of randomized controlled trials

被引:300
作者
Schroeder, K
Fahey, T
Ebrahim, S
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Div Primary Hlth Care, Bristol BS6 6JL, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol BS6 6JL, Avon, England
[3] Univ Dundee, Tayside Ctr Gen Practice, Dundee, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.164.7.722
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Lack of adherence to blood pressure-lowering medication is a major reason for poor control of hypertension worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of interventions to increase adherence to blood pressure-lowering medication. Methods: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and searched for all-language publications in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL in April 2002. Results: We included 38 studies testing 58 different interventions and containing data on 15 519 patients. The studies were conducted in 9 countries between 1975 and 2000. The duration of follow-up ranged from 2 to 60 months. Because of heterogeneity between studies in terms of interventions and the methods used to measure adherence, we did not pool the results. Simplifying dosing regimens increased adherence in 7 of 9 studies, with a relative increase in adherence of 8% to 19.6%. Motivational strategies were partly successful in 10 of 24 studies with generally small increases in adherence up to a maximum of 23%. Complex interventions comparing more than 1 technique increased adherence in 8 of 18 studies, ranging from 5% to a maximum of 41%. Patient education alone seemed largely unsuccessful. Conclusions: Reducing the number of daily doses appears to be effective in increasing adherence to blood pressure-lowering medication and should be tried as a first-line strategy, although there is so far less evidence of an effect on blood pressure reduction. Some motivational strategies and complex interventions appear promising, but we need more evidence on their effect through carefully designed randomized controlled trials.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 732
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Electronic pill-boxes in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment compliance:: Comparison of once daily versus twice daily regimen [J].
Andrejak, M ;
Genes, N ;
Vaur, L ;
Poncelet, P ;
Clerson, P ;
Carré, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 13 (02) :184-190
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for action
[3]  
[Anonymous], International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.2042-7174.2000.TB01002.X, 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2000.tb01002.x]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Journal of Geriatric Drug Therapy
[5]   PATIENTS COMPLIANCE IN HYPERTENSION - THE IMPORTANCE OF NUMBER OF TABLETS [J].
ASPLUND, J ;
DANIELSON, M ;
OHMAN, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1984, 17 (05) :547-552
[6]  
BAIRD MG, 1984, CLIN INVEST MED, V7, P95
[7]  
BECKER LA, 1986, J FAM PRACTICE, V22, P357
[8]   Comparison between a bid and a tid regimen: Improved compliance with no improved antihypertensive effect [J].
Boissel, JP ;
Meillard, O ;
PerrinFayolle, E ;
Ducruet, T ;
Alamercery, Y ;
Sassano, P ;
Benghozi, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 50 (1-2) :63-67
[9]  
Bowling A, 2001, QUAL HEALTH CARE, V10, pI2
[10]   THERAPEUTIC ADHERENCE IN THE ELDERLY - TRANSDERMAL CLONIDINE COMPARED TO ORAL VERAPAMIL FOR HYPERTENSION [J].
BURRIS, JF ;
PAPADEMETRIOU, V ;
WALLIN, JD ;
COOK, ME ;
WEIDLER, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 91 :S22-S28