Stability of nursing home quality indicators over time

被引:46
作者
Karon, SL [1 ]
Sainfort, F [1 ]
Zimmerman, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Hlth Syst Res & Anal, Madison, WI 53705 USA
关键词
quality indicators; nursing homes;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-199906000-00006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND. Nursing home quality indicators (QIs) provide a way to support quality assurance and improvement activities and to help ensure that cost savings are based on increased efficiency and not on decreased quality of care. OBJECTIVES. QIs values are expected to change over time. However, to be good indicators of quality, they should be reasonably stable over "short" periods. This paper discusses theoretical and measurement issues affecting stability and examines the stability of QIs over each of two 3-month periods and one 6-month period. SUBJECTS. The study sample included 512 nursing facilities from two states, Kansas and South Dakota. QIs were measured for the first 3 quarters of 1996. MEASURES. Facility level QIs were constructed using three different metrics that each provide a unique perspective of facility performance as follows: the proportion of residents in the facility with the QI condition; the facility's percentile rank in its state; and a variable indicating whether the facility's rank exceeded the 90th percentile in its state. QI stability was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients, Spearman rank order correlation coefficients, and Cohen's Kappa, as appropriate for the metric. RESULTS. Results indicated high levels of stability for most QIs, with lower levels of stability found to be in keeping with theoretical and measurement considerations. CONCLUSIONS. QIs are reasonably stable over short periods of time. Quality improvement efforts may best be focused on facilities that are consistently poor performers over time, and those that show a large decrease in quality from one quarter to the next.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 579
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, MEASURES ASS
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.2307/2529310
[3]   Risk adjustment of nursing home quality indicators [J].
Arling, G ;
Karon, SL ;
Sainfort, F ;
Zimmerman, DR ;
Ross, R .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1997, 37 (06) :757-766
[4]  
BALUM CS, 1997, AM J CLIN NUTR, V66, P787
[5]   BENEFITS AND OBSTACLES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS ASSESSMENT MEASURES IN CLINICAL SETTINGS [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (05) :MS50-MS56
[6]   RELIABILITY ESTIMATES FOR THE MINIMUM DATA SET FOR NURSING-HOME RESIDENT ASSESSMENT AND CARE SCREENING (MDS) [J].
HAWES, C ;
MORRIS, JN ;
PHILLIPS, CD ;
MOR, V ;
FRIES, BE ;
NONEMAKER, S .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1995, 35 (02) :172-178
[7]  
KARON SL, 1997, VALIDATION NURSING H
[8]   Verifying nursing home care quality using minimum data set quality indicators and other quality measures [J].
Rantz, MJ ;
Popejoy, L ;
Mehr, DR ;
ZwygartStauffacher, M ;
Hicks, LL ;
Grando, V ;
Conn, VS ;
Porter, R ;
Scott, J ;
Maas, M .
JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 1997, 12 (02) :54-62
[9]   CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL SOURCES OF VARIATION IN THE MEASUREMENT OF NURSING FACILITY QUALITY - AN EVALUATION OF 24 MODELS AND AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY [J].
SAINFORT, F ;
RAMSAY, JD ;
MONATO, H .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 1995, 52 (01) :60-87
[10]  
ZIMMERMAN D, 1993, MULTISTATE NURSING H