A Decision-Making Framework for Sediment Contamination

被引:124
作者
Chapman, Peter M. [1 ]
Anderson, Janette [2 ]
机构
[1] Golder Associates, 195 Pemberton Ave, N Vancouver, BC V7P 2R4, Canada
[2] Environm Canada, Restorat Programs Div, Environm Conservat Branch, Burlington, ON L7R 4A6, Canada
关键词
Contaminated sediments; Weight of evidence; Toxicity; Benthos; Biomagnification;
D O I
10.1897/2005-013R.1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A decision-making framework for determining whether or not contaminated sediments are polluted is described. This framework is intended to be sufficiently prescriptive to standardize the decision-making process but without using "cook book'' assessments. It emphasizes 4 guidance "rules'': (1) sediment chemistry data are only to be used alone for remediation decisions when the costs of further investigation outweigh the costs of remediation and there is agreement among all stakeholders to act; (2) remediation decisions are based primarily on biology; (3) lines of evidence (LOE), such as laboratory toxicity tests and models that contradict the results of properly conducted field surveys, are assumed incorrect; and (4) if the impacts of a remedial alternative will cause more environmental harm than good, then it should not be implemented. Sediments with contaminant concentrations below sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) that predict toxicity to less than 5% of sediment-dwelling infauna and that contain no quantifiable concentrations of substances capable of biomagnifying are excluded from further consideration, as are sediments that do not meet these criteria but have contaminant concentrations equal to or below reference concentrations. Biomagnification potential is initially addressed by conservative (worst case) modeling based on benthos and sediments and, subsequently, by additional food chain data and more realistic assumptions. Toxicity (acute and chronic) and alterations to resident communities are addressed by, respectively, laboratory studies and field observations. The integrative decision point for sediments is a weight of evidence (WOE) matrix combining up to 4 main LOE: chemistry, toxicity, community alteration, and biomagnification potential. Of 16 possible WOE scenarios, 6 result in definite decisions, and 10 require additional assessment. Typically, this framework will be applied to surficial sediments. The possibility that deeper sediments may be uncovered as a result of natural or other processes must also be investigated and may require similar assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 173
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Ankley G. T., 1995, Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health, V4, P133, DOI 10.1007/BF00116649
[2]  
[Anonymous], MET MIN GUID DOC AQ
[3]   Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments: Part I, Developing an Effective Investigation and Risk Evaluation Strategy [J].
Apitz, Sabine E. ;
Davis, John W. ;
Finkelstein, Ken ;
Hohreiter, David W. ;
Hoke, Robert ;
Jensen, Richard H. ;
Jersak, Joe ;
Kirtay, Victoria J. ;
Mack, E. Erin ;
Magar, Victor S. ;
Moore, David ;
Reible, Danny ;
Stahl, Ralph G., Jr. .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 1 (01) :2-8
[4]   Identifying cause in sediment assessments: bioavailability and the Sediment Quality Triad [J].
Borgmann, U ;
Norwood, WP ;
Reynoldson, TB ;
Rosa, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2001, 58 (05) :950-960
[5]   Characterizing and identifying toxicants in marine waters: a review of marine toxicity identification evaluations (TIEs) [J].
Burgess, RM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2000, 13 (1-6) :2-33
[6]   Weight-of-evidence approaches for assessing ecosystem impairment [J].
Burton, GA ;
Chapman, PM ;
Smith, EP .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2002, 8 (07) :1657-1673
[7]  
Canada Environment, 1998, 1RM35 FPS ENV CAN
[8]  
[CCME] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 1996, 1084101996F CCME EN
[9]   Weight-of-evidence issues and frameworks for sediment quality (and other) assessments [J].
Chapman, PM ;
McDonald, BG ;
Lawrence, GS .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2002, 8 (07) :1489-1515
[10]   Presentation and interpretation of sediment quality triad data [J].
Chapman, PM .
ECOTOXICOLOGY, 1996, 5 (05) :327-339