Clinical trial of an educational intervention to achieve recommended cholesterol levels in patients with coronary artery disease

被引:29
作者
Lichtman, JH
Amatruda, J
Yaari, S
Cheng, S
Smith, GL
Mattera, JA
Roumanis, SA
Wang, Y
Radford, MJ
Krumholz, HM
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Sect Chron Dis Epidemiol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale New Haven Med Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Sect Hlth Policy & Adm, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2003.06.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Despite national efforts to improve cholesterol management for patients with coronary artery disease, many patients are not reaching recommended cholesterol target levels. We sought to determine whether a nurse-based educational intervention, designed to educate patients with confirmed coronary artery disease about personal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol target levels and encourage partnership with physicians, could increase adherence with National Cholesterol Education Program target levels (LDL cholesterol level less than or equal to100 mg/dL). Methods Patients hospitalized with confirmed coronary artery disease were randomized to undergo a nurse-based educational intervention (375 patients) or usual care (381 patients) for a 12-month period after hospitalization. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients at the LDL cholesterol target level 1 year after hospitalization. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients with accurate knowledge of LDL cholesterol target levels. Results The groups were similar at baseline in demographic and clinical characteristics, percent at LDL cholesterol target level (43.9% and 41.1%, respectively), and percent with knowledge of LDL cholesterol target levels (both 5%). The proportion of patients at LDL cholesterol target levels at I year did not differ between the intervention (70.2%) and usual care group (67.4%, P = .46). At the conclusion of the trial, patient knowledge about LDL cholesterol target level was higher for the intervention group than the usual care group (19.6% and 6.7%, respectively, P = .001), but this was not associated with improved cholesterol management. Conclusions Our nurse-based educational intervention did not result in a significant increase in the proportion of patients who reached target LDL cholesterol levels 1 year after hospitalization. Although the intervention improved patient knowledge of LDL cholesterol target levels, overall rates of LDL cholesterol knowledge remained low, and it was not associated with improved cholesterol management.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 528
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Management of coronary risk factors by registered nurses versus usual care in patients with unstable angina pectoris (A Chest Pain Evaluation in The Emergency room [CHEER] substudy)
    Allison, TG
    Farkouh, ME
    Smars, PA
    Evans, RW
    Squires, RW
    Gabriel, SE
    Kopecky, SL
    Gibbons, RJ
    Reeder, GS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 86 (02) : 133 - 138
  • [2] Allison TG, 1999, MAYO CLIN PROC, V74, P466
  • [3] Nurse-mediated cholesterol management compared with enhanced primary care in siblings of individuals with premature coronary disease
    Becker, DM
    Raqueño, JV
    Yook, RM
    Kral, BG
    Blumenthal, RS
    Moy, TF
    Bezirdjian, PJ
    Becker, LC
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (14) : 1533 - 1539
  • [4] Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: a randomised trial of nurse led clinics in primary care
    Campbell, NC
    Ritchie, LD
    Thain, J
    Deans, HG
    Rawles, JM
    Squair, JL
    [J]. HEART, 1998, 80 (05) : 447 - 452
  • [5] Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
    Cleeman, JI
    Grundy, SM
    Becker, D
    Clark, LT
    Cooper, RS
    Denke, MA
    Howard, WJ
    Hunninghake, DB
    Illingworth, DR
    Luepker, RV
    McBride, P
    McKenney, JM
    Pasternak, RC
    Stone, NJ
    Van Horn, L
    Brewer, HB
    Ernst, ND
    Gordon, D
    Levy, D
    Rifkind, B
    Rossouw, JE
    Savage, P
    Haffner, SM
    Orloff, DG
    Proschan, MA
    Schwartz, JS
    Sempos, CT
    Shero, ST
    Murray, EZ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19): : 2486 - 2497
  • [6] A CASE-MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR CORONARY RISK FACTOR MODIFICATION AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    DEBUSK, RF
    MILLER, NH
    SUPERKO, HR
    DENNIS, CA
    THOMAS, RJ
    LEW, HT
    BERGER, WE
    HELLER, RS
    ROMPF, J
    GEE, D
    KRAEMER, HC
    BANDURA, A
    GHANDOUR, G
    CLARK, M
    SHAH, RV
    FISHER, L
    TAYLOR, CB
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 120 (09) : 721 - 729
  • [7] Does the chronic care model serve also as a template for improving prevention?
    Glasgow, RE
    Orleans, CT
    Wagner, EH
    Curry, SJ
    Solberg, LI
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2001, 79 (04) : 579 - +
  • [8] Treatment patterns and distribution of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in treatment-eligible United States adults
    Hoerger, TJ
    Bala, MV
    Bray, JW
    Wilcosky, TC
    LaRosa, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (01) : 61 - 65
  • [9] Jolly K, 1999, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V318, P706
  • [10] OUTCOMES MONITORING OF FLUVASTATIN IN A DEPARTMENT-OF-VETERANS-AFFAIRS LIPID CLINIC
    KELLICK, KA
    BURNS, K
    MCANDREW, E
    HABERI, E
    HOOK, N
    ELLIS, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 76 (02) : A62 - A64