The quality of commercial wheat silages in Israel

被引:36
作者
Weinberg, Z. G. [1 ]
Chen, Y. [1 ]
Solomon, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Agr Res Org, Volcani Ctr, Dept Food Sci, Forage Preservat & Byprod Res Unit, IL-50250 Bet Dagan, Israel
[2] Israeli Minist Agr & Rural Dev, Dept Dairy Cattle, IL-50250 Bet Dagan, Israel
关键词
commercial wheat silage; digestibility; regression analysis; MATURITY;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2008-1120
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Wheat silages are the major roughage for high-producing lactating dairy cows in Israel; therefore, their quality is important. The main objective of the current study was to determine the preservation status and nutritional quality of commercial wheat silages in Israel. An additional objective was to develop predictive equations for dry matter digestibility (DMD) and neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD) based on chemical composition of the silages, which would permit estimation of the digestibility from chemical composition. A total of 143 commercial wheat silages were sampled and analyzed for 3 yr. Fourteen random samples that were not included in the regression analysis were used to validate the equations by the bias and error of the model. Results revealed that wheat silages were quite sensitive to aerobic exposure; additives resulted in some improvement of the aerobic stability. After choosing the significant terms from ash, crude protein (CP), NDF, acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) by PROC STEPWISE of SAS, the following prediction equations were obtained from all 143 samples: DMD = 86.3 + (0.70 x CP) - (0.46 x ADF) - (1.67 x ADL); and NDFD = 20.3 + (1.00 x CP) + (1.16 x NDF) - (0.88 x ADF) - (2.25 x ADL). The bias and the error of the prediction model for DMD were approximately 0.006 and 0.065, respectively; the bias and error for NDFD were approximately 0.007 and 0.118, respectively. It was concluded that the prediction model for DMD was quite adequate, whereas that for NDFD was less acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 644
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
ARIELI A, 1994, J DAIRY SCI, V76, P237
[2]   Wheat silage: Effect of cultivar and stage of maturity on yield and degradability in situ [J].
Ashbell, G ;
Weinberg, ZG ;
Bruckental, I ;
Tabori, K ;
Sharet, N .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1997, 45 (03) :709-712
[3]  
ASHBELL G, 1991, CAN AGR ENG, V33, P391
[4]  
BARKER B, 1941, J BIOL CHEM, V138, P535
[5]  
Buxton D.R., 2003, SILAGE SCI TECHNOLOG, P199, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR42
[6]  
DUBOIS M, 1956, ANAL CHEM, V28, P356, DOI DOI 10.1021/AC60111A017
[7]   A QUANTITATIVE MODEL OF THE ENSILAGE PROCESS IN LACTATE SILAGES [J].
PITT, RE ;
MUCK, RE ;
LEIBENSPERGER, RY .
GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 1985, 40 (03) :279-303
[8]  
*SAS I INC, 1982, US GUID
[9]  
SNEDECOR GW, 1979, STAT METHODS, P504
[10]  
TILLEY J. M. A., 1963, JOUR BRIT GRASSLAND SOC, V18, P104