Noninvasive patient fixation for extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy

被引:99
作者
Lohr, F
Debus, J
Frank, C
Herfarth, K
Pastyr, O
Rhein, B
Bahner, ML
Schlegel, W
Wannenmacher, M
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Clin Radiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Phys Med, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
[4] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1999年 / 45卷 / 02期
关键词
noninvasive patient immobilization; setup accuracy; fractionated extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy; paraspinal tumors;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00190-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the setup accuracy that can be achieved with a novel noninvasive patient fixation technique based on a body cast attached to a recently developed stereotactic body frame during fractionated extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Thirty-one CT studies (greater than or equal to 20 slices, thickness: 3 mm) from 5 patients who were immobilized in a body cast attached to a stereotactic body frame for treatment of paramedullary tumors in the thoracic or lumbar spine were evaluated with respect to setup accuracy. The immobilization device consisted of a custom-made wrap-around body cast that extended from the neck to the thighs and a separate head mask, both made from Scotchcast. Each CT study was performed immediately before or after every second or third actual treatment fraction without repositioning the patient between CT and treatment. The stereotactic localization system was mounted and the isocenter as initially located stereotactically was marked with fiducials for each CT study. Deviation of the treated isocenter as compared to the planned position was measured in all three dimensions. Results: The immobilization device can be easily handled, attached to and removed from the stereotactic frame and thus enables treatment of multiple patients with the same stereotactic frame each day. Mean patient movements of 1.6 mm +/- 1.2 mm (laterolateral [LL]), 1.4 mm +/- 1.0 mm (anterior-posterior [AP]), 2.3 mm +/- 1.3 mm (transversal vectorial error [VE]) and < slice thickness = 3 mm (craniocaudal [CC]) were recorded for the targets in the thoracic spine and 1.4 mm +/- 1.0 mm (LL), 1.2 mm +/- 0.7 mm (AP), 1.8 mm +/- 1.2 mm (VE), and < 3 mm (CC) for the lumbar spine. The worst case deviation was 3.9 mm for the first patient with the target in the thoracic spine tin the LL direction). Combining those numbers (mean transversal VE for both locations and maximum CC error of 3 mm), the mean three-dimensional vectorial patient movement and thus the mean overall accuracy can be safely estimated to be less than or equal to 3.6 mm. Conclusion: The presented combination of a body cast and head mask system in a rigid stereotactic body frame ensures reliable noninvasive patient fixation for fractionated extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy and may enable dose escalation for less radioresponsive tumors that are near the spinal cord or otherwise critically located while minimizing the risk of late sequelae. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 527
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   TRANSFER ERRORS OF PLANNING CT TO SIMULATOR - A POSSIBLE SOURCE OF SETUP INACCURACIES [J].
BEL, A ;
BARTELINK, H ;
VIJLBRIEF, RE ;
LEBESQUE, JV .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 31 (02) :176-180
[2]   Impact of cradle immobilization on setup reproducibility during external beam radiation therapy for lung cancer [J].
Bentel, GC ;
Marks, LB ;
Krishnamurthy, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (03) :527-531
[3]   STEREOTAXIC HIGH-DOSE FRACTION RADIATION-THERAPY OF EXTRACRANIAL TUMORS USING AN ACCELERATOR - CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRST 31 PATIENTS [J].
BLOMGREN, H ;
LAX, I ;
NASLUND, I ;
SVANSTROM, R .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1995, 34 (06) :861-870
[4]   EXPERIENCE IN CHARGED-PARTICLE IRRADIATION OF TUMORS OF THE SKULL BASE - 1977-1992 [J].
CASTRO, JR ;
LINSTADT, DE ;
BAHARY, JP ;
PETTI, PL ;
DAFTARI, I ;
COLLIER, JM ;
GUTIN, PH ;
GAUGER, G ;
PHILLIPS, TL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 29 (04) :647-655
[5]   Image-oriented planning of minimally invasive conformal radiotherapy in the head and neck [J].
Debus, J ;
EngenhartCabillic, R ;
Knopp, MV ;
Schad, LR ;
Schlegel, W ;
Wannenmacher, M .
RADIOLOGE, 1996, 36 (09) :732-736
[6]   Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data [J].
Gilhuijs, KGA ;
vandeVen, PJH ;
vanHerk, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (03) :389-399
[7]   PRELIMINARY CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH LINEAR ACCELERATOR-BASED SPINAL STEREOTAXIC RADIOSURGERY [J].
HAMILTON, AJ ;
LULU, BA ;
FOSMIRE, H ;
STEA, B ;
CASSADY, JR .
NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 36 (02) :311-319
[8]   LOCALLY CHALLENGING OSTEOGENIC AND CHONDROGENIC TUMORS OF THE AXIAL SKELETON - RESULTS OF COMBINED PROTON AND PHOTON RADIATION-THERAPY USING 3-DIMENSIONAL TREATMENT PLANNING [J].
HUG, EB ;
FITZEK, MM ;
LIEBSCH, NJ ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (03) :467-476
[9]   STEREOTAXIC RADIOTHERAPY OF MALIGNANCIES IN THE ABDOMEN - METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS [J].
LAX, I ;
BLOMGREN, H ;
NASLUND, I ;
SVANSTROM, R .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1994, 33 (06) :677-683
[10]   Combined error of patient positioning variability and prostate motion uncertainty in 3D conformal radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer [J].
Rudat, V ;
Schraube, P ;
Oetzel, D ;
Zierhut, D ;
Flentje, M ;
Wannenmacher, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (05) :1027-1034