Spatial-econometric analysis of attraction and repulsion of private conservation by public reserves

被引:33
作者
Albers, Heidi J. [2 ]
Ando, Amy W. [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoxuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Coll Forestry, Dept Forest Resources, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] HSBC N Amer, Princeton, NJ USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
land conservation; fragmentation; agglomeration; private provision; land trusts; spatial econometrics; attraction; repulsion;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2008.01.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is difficult for public agencies to make optimal reserve-site selections without knowing how new public reserves might influence the configuration of private conservation. Private land trusts protect much land in the USA, but little is known about how private groups respond to conservation decisions made by other conservation agents. To fill that gap, we analyze township-level spatial data on conservation in California, Illinois, and Massachusetts to explore relationships between the location of private and public conservation land. Using linear spatial-econometric models and Bayesian spatial probit models, we find evidence that private-protected acres are clustered together in space. In California, it appears that private land conservation is attracted towards places where the government has reserves. In Illinois and Massachusetts, however, it appears that private conservation shifts away from townships with government reserves due to a mixture of spatial repulsion and simple acreage displacement. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 49
页数:17
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Modeling ecological constraints on tropical forest management: Spatial interdependence, irreversibility, and uncertainty [J].
Albers, HJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (01) :73-94
[2]   Could state-level variation in the number of land trusts make economic sense? [J].
Albers, HJ ;
Ando, AW .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (03) :311-327
[3]  
ALBERS HJ, 2006, PATTERNS MULTIAGENT
[4]   Toward a theory of charitable fund-raising [J].
Andreoni, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1998, 106 (06) :1186-1213
[5]   Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence [J].
Anselin, L ;
Bera, AK ;
Florax, R ;
Yoon, MJ .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1996, 26 (01) :77-104
[6]  
Anselin L., 1988, Spatial econometrics: methods and models, V4
[7]   Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls [J].
Brueckner, JK .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1998, 44 (03) :438-467
[8]   Determinants of residential land-use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe [J].
Carrión-Flores, C ;
Irwin, EG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 86 (04) :889-904
[9]   Dynamic reserve site selection [J].
Costello, C ;
Polasky, S .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (02) :157-174
[10]  
Fleming MM., 2004, Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools and applications, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-05617-2_7