Mutational analysis of TP53 and p21 in familial and sporadic ovarian cancer in Japan

被引:7
作者
Amikura, T
Sekine, M
Hirai, Y
Fujimoto, S
Hatae, M
Kobayashi, I
Fujii, T
Nagata, I
Ushijima, K
Obata, K
Suzuki, M
Yoshinaga, M
Umesaki, N
Satoh, S
Enomoto, T
Motoyama, S
Nishino, K
Haino, K
Tanaka, K
机构
[1] Niigata Univ, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Niigata 9518510, Japan
[2] Hokkaido Univ, Sch Med, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060, Japan
[3] Kagoshima City Hosp, Kagoshima, Japan
[4] Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hosp, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[5] Natl Kure Med Ctr, Hiroshima, Japan
[6] Natl Def Med Coll, Saitama, Japan
[7] Kurume Univ, Sch Med, Fukuoka, Japan
[8] Kinki Univ, Sch Med, Osaka 589, Japan
[9] Jichi Med Sch, Tochigi, Japan
[10] Kagoshima Univ, Sch Med, Kagoshima 890, Japan
[11] Osaka City Univ, Sch Med, Osaka 545, Japan
[12] Tohoku Univ, Sch Med, Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan
[13] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Osaka, Japan
[14] Kobe Univ, Sch Med, Kobe, Hyogo 650, Japan
关键词
BRCA1; p53; p21; ovarian cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.09.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To investigate whether somatic mutations in cell cycle checkpoint genes, TP53 and p21, are involved in the development of ovarian cancer with or without BRCA1 germline mutation. Methods. We analyzed somatic genetic alterations of TP53 and p21 in 46 ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1 germline mutations and 93 sporadic patients, using direct sequencing for the entire coding sequences in TP53 and p21. Results. TP53 somatic mutations were detected in 25 of the 46 BRCA1 cases and 40 of the 93 sporadic cases (54.3% vs. 43.0%). In contrast, p21 somatic mutations were detected in I of the 46 BRCA1 cases and 2 of the 93 sporadic cases (2.2% vs. 2.2%). TP53 mutations in sporadic cases more frequently occurred in exons 6-11 than those in cases with germline BRCA1 mutations (84.4% vs. 56.3%: P = 0.013). The proportion of sporadic cases with TP53 mutations in non-serous tumors (e.g. endometrioid, clear cell, or mucinous) was significantly lower than that in serous tumors (18.5% vs. 53.0%: P = 0.0038). However, there was no significant difference between the proportion of BRCA1 cases with TP53 mutation in non-serous and in serous tumors (37.5% vs. 57.9%). Conclusions. Our results suggest that somatic mutation of TP53 plays less of a role in the carcinogenesis of sporadic non-serous tumors than in that of sporadic serous tumors or BRCA1-related tumors. Furthermore, p21 somatic mutation appears to be less involved in the development of ovarian cancer than TP53 somatic mutation. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 371
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The p53 network [J].
Agarwal, ML ;
Taylor, WR ;
Chernov, MV ;
Chernova, OB ;
Stark, GR .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 273 (01) :1-4
[2]   DNA repair/pro-apoptotic dual-role proteins in five major DNA repair pathways: fail-safe protection against carcinogenesis [J].
Bernstein, C ;
Bernstein, H ;
Payne, CM ;
Garewal, H .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2002, 511 (02) :145-178
[3]   Functions of the BRGA1 and BRCA2 genes [J].
Bertwistle, D ;
Ashworth, A .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 8 (01) :14-20
[4]  
Boyd J, 1998, ONCOLOGY-NY, V12, P399
[5]  
Buller RE, 2001, CLIN CANCER RES, V7, P831
[6]   CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE OF A P53 TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR DNA COMPLEX - UNDERSTANDING TUMORIGENIC MUTATIONS [J].
CHO, YJ ;
GORINA, S ;
JEFFREY, PD ;
PAVLETICH, NP .
SCIENCE, 1994, 265 (5170) :346-355
[7]   p53 mutation with frequent novel codons but not a mutator phenotype in BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast tumours [J].
Crook, T ;
Brooks, LA ;
Crossland, S ;
Osin, P ;
Barker, KT ;
Waller, J ;
Philp, E ;
Smith, PD ;
Yulug, I ;
Peto, J ;
Parker, G ;
Allday, MJ ;
Crompton, MR ;
Gusterson, BA .
ONCOGENE, 1998, 17 (13) :1681-1689
[8]  
DOUGLAS A, 2002, GYNECOL ONCOL, V85, P431
[9]  
Elbendary AA, 1996, CLIN CANCER RES, V2, P1571
[10]   Partial rescue of Brca1(5-6) early embryonic lethality by p53 or p21 null mutation [J].
Hakem, R ;
delaPompa, JL ;
Eli, A ;
Potter, J ;
Mak, TW .
NATURE GENETICS, 1997, 16 (03) :298-302