Is OECD real per capita GDP trend or difference stationary? Evidence from panel unit root tests

被引:33
作者
Fleissig, AR [1 ]
Strauss, J
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, St Louis, France
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0164-0704(99)80001-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Panel unit root tests are used to evaluate if real per capita GDP for OECD economies are trend or difference stationary. The panel approaches require that the series in the panel are independent, but evidence from the correlation matrix of the residuals indicates dependence. The panel unit root procedures are thus adjusted to allow for correlation in the data using different approaches. There is overwhelming evidence that the OECD data are trend stationary using bootstrap methods that accommodate more general forms of serial and cross correlation in the data compared to the standard approach of subtracting cross sectional means.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 689
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   PURCHASING POWER PARITY IN THE LONG-RUN [J].
ABUAF, N ;
JORION, P .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1990, 45 (01) :157-174
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, WORLD EC 20 CENTURY
[3]   RECURSIVE AND SEQUENTIAL-TESTS OF THE UNIT-ROOT AND TREND-BREAK HYPOTHESES - THEORY AND INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE [J].
BANERJEE, A ;
LUMSDAINE, RL ;
STOCK, JH .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1992, 10 (03) :271-287
[4]   The great wars, the great crash, and steady state growth: Some new evidence about an old stylized fact [J].
BenDavid, D ;
Papell, DH .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1995, 36 (03) :453-475
[5]  
BERKOWITZ J, 1996, FEDERAL RESERVE BOAR, V9645, P1
[6]   CONVERGENCE IN INTERNATIONAL OUTPUT [J].
BERNARD, AB ;
DURLAUF, SN .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 10 (02) :97-108
[7]  
Campbell J., 1995, AM ECON REV, V77, P111
[8]  
CANZONERI M, IN PRESS J INT EC
[9]   New panel unit root tests of PPP [J].
Coakley, J ;
Fuertes, AM .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1997, 57 (01) :17-22
[10]   INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE ON THE SIZE OF THE RANDOM-WALK IN OUTPUT [J].
COGLEY, T .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (03) :501-518