Trajectory and driving factors for GHG emissions in the Chinese cement industry

被引:154
作者
Wang, Yilei [1 ]
Zhu, Qinghua [1 ]
Geng, Yong [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Inst Ecoplanning & Dev, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, Circular Econ & Ind Ecol Res Grp, Key Lab Pollut Ecol & Environm Engn, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Provin, Peoples R China
关键词
GHG emissions inventory; Driving factors; Chinese cement industry; LMDI; CO2; EMISSIONS; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; ENERGY; REDUCTION; TECHNOLOGIES; CAPTURE; GREEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accounting for 7% of energy consumption from all industrial sectors and 15% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China in 2009, the cement industry should be one of the main sectors to implement low carbon development. However, a detailed study on presenting its GHG emission trajectory and identifying the key driving factors has yet to be done. Under such a circumstance, this paper first presents a GHG emission inventory of the cement industry in China and then identifies the main driving factors that influence changes of GHG emissions in the cement industry by adopting LMDI method. Our results show that the total GHG emission in 2009 was 1095.1 Mt carbon dioxide equivalent (CO(2)e), of which 592.8 Mt CO(2)e was process-related and 502.3 Mt CO(2)e was energy-related. The major factors responsible for the increase of GHG emissions during 2005-2009 include cement production activity effect and clinker production activity effect, while energy intensity effect played a positive role to offset total GHG emissions. Finally, we present our policy implications and provide possible technical solutions for reducing GHG emissions of the cement industry in China. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 260
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Handling zero values in the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Liu, Na .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (01) :238-246
[2]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[3]   Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition [J].
Ang, BW ;
Zhang, FQ ;
Choi, KH .
ENERGY, 1998, 23 (06) :489-495
[4]   A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation [J].
Ang, BW ;
Liu, FL .
ENERGY, 2001, 26 (06) :537-548
[5]  
[Anonymous], WORLD URB PROSP 2007
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, INT EN OUTL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CHIN CEM ALM 2008
[8]  
[Anonymous], CHIN CEM ALM 2009
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, HDB CEM CONCR ROADS
[10]  
[Anonymous], INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS