An overview of relations among causal modelling methods

被引:230
作者
Greenland, S
Brumback, B
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Coll Letters & Sci, Dept Stat, Dept Epidemiol,UCLA Sch Publ Hlth, Topanga, CA 90290 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Bias; causal diagrams; causality; confounding; data analysis; direct effects; epidemiological methods; graphical models; inference; instrumental variables; risk analysis; sufficient-component cause models; structural equations;
D O I
10.1093/ije/31.5.1030
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper provides a brief overview to four major types of causal models for health-sciences research: Graphical models (causal diagrams), potential-outcome (counterfactual) models, sufficient-component cause models, and structural-equations models. The paper focuses on the logical connections among the different types of models and on the different strengths of each approach. Graphical models can illustrate qualitative population assumptions and sources of bias not easily seen with other approaches; sufficient-component cause models can illustrate specific hypotheses about mechanisms of action; and potential-outcome and structural-equations models provide a basis for quantitative analysis of effects. The different approaches provide complementary perspectives, and can be employed together to improve causal interpretations of conventional statistical results.
引用
收藏
页码:1030 / 1037
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条