Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer - The process and content of informed consent

被引:154
作者
Geller, G
Botkin, JR
Green, MJ
Press, N
Biesecker, B
Wilfond, B
Grana, G
Daly, MB
Schneider, K
Kahn, MJE
机构
[1] UNIV UTAH, ECCLES INST HUMAN GENET, UTAH CTR HUMAN GENOME RES, SALT LAKE CITY, UT USA
[2] MILTON S HERSHEY MED CTR, DEPT HUMANITIES, HERSHEY, PA USA
[3] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, SCH MED, DEPT PSYCHIAT & BIOBEHAV SCI, LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 USA
[4] NATL HUMAN GENOME RES INST, MED GENET BRANCH, BETHESDA, MD USA
[5] UNIV ARIZONA, DEPT PEDIAT, TUCSON, AZ 85721 USA
[6] CANC CTR SO NEW JERSEY, CAMDEN, NJ USA
[7] FOX CHASE CANC CTR, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19111 USA
[8] DANA FARBER CANC INST, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[9] NATL BREAST CANC COALIT, RICHMOND, VA USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1997年 / 277卷 / 18期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.277.18.1467
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective.-To provide guidance on informed consent to clinicians offering cancer susceptibility testing. Participants.-The Task Force on Informed Consent is part of the Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium (CGSC), whose members were recipients of National Institutes of Health grants to assess the implications of cancer susceptibility testing. The 10 task force members represent a range of relevant backgrounds, including various medical specialties, social science, genetic counseling, and consumer advocacy. Evidence.-The CGSC held 3 public meetings from 1994 to 1996. At its first meeting, the task force jointly established a list of topics. The cochairs (G.G. and J.R.B) then developed an outline and assigned each topic to an appropriate writer and reviewer, Writers summarized the literature on their topics and drafted recommendations, which were then revised by the reviewers. The cochairs compiled and edited the entire manuscript. All members were involved in writing this report. Consensus Process.-The first draft was distributed to task force members, after which a meeting was held to discuss its content and organization. Consensus was reached by voting. A subsequent draft was presented to the entire CGSC at its third meeting, and comments were incorporated. Conclusions.-The task force recommends that informed consent for cancer susceptibility testing be an ongoing process of education and counseling in which (1) providers elicit participant, family, and community values and disclose their own, (2) decision making is shared, (3) the style of information disclosure is individualized, and (4) specific content areas are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1467 / 1474
页数:8
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Allen K D, 1995, Pediatr Dent, V17, P180
[2]  
*AM COUNC LIF INS, 1991, REP ACLI HIAA TASK F
[3]  
ANDRES LB, 1994, ASSESSING GENETIC RI, P259
[4]  
ANDREWS LB, 1987, MED GENETICS LEGAL F, P38
[5]  
[Anonymous], INFORMED CONSENT GUI
[6]  
APPELBAUM PS, 1987, INFORMED CONSENT LEG
[7]  
Asch A, 1996, FEMINISM BIOETHICS R
[8]   VIDEOTAPE AIDS INFORMED CONSENT DECISION [J].
BARBOUR, GL ;
BLUMENKRANTZ, MJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1978, 240 (25) :2741-2742
[9]   Educating patients about cystic fibrosis carrier screening in a primary care setting [J].
Bernhardt, BA ;
Chase, GA ;
Faden, RR ;
Geller, G ;
Hofman, KJ ;
Tambor, ES ;
Holtzman, NA .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1996, 5 (06) :336-340
[10]  
BERNHARDT BA, IN PRESS J GENET COU