Rapid restructuring of bicoid-dependent hunchback promoters within and between Dipteran species:: implications for molecular coevolution

被引:58
作者
McGregor, AP
Shaw, PJ
Hancock, JM
Bopp, D
Hediger, M
Wratten, NS
Dover, GA
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Genet, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[2] Univ London Royal Holloway & Bedford New Coll, Dept Comp Sci, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Zool, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1525-142X.2001.01043.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Interacting genetic elements need to co-evolve if their joint function is to be maintained; for example, the correct binding of transcriptional regulators to defined binding sites in gene promoters needs to be maintained during evolution to ensure proper function. As part of a wider investigation into the molecular coevolution of the Dipteran homeodomain-bearing regulator bicoid (bcd) and Bcd-dependent promoters, we present data on the functional, structural, and sequence differences between the promoters of the segmentation gene hunchback (hb), in several species of Cyclorrhaphan (higher) Diptera. The result of phenocopying hb mutations using RNA interference (RNAi) in Musca domestica shows broadly similar functions to the hb gene in Drosophila melanogaster. However, the Bcd-binding sites in the hb promoters of Drosophila, Musca, and the two blowfly species Lucilia sericata and Calliphora vicina differ in copy number, sequence, orientation, and spacing. Furthermore, all promoters are subject to rapid turnover by slippage-like processes leading to high densities of short repetitive motifs. A study of polymorphism among six strains of M. domestica reveals that turnover by slippage also occurs in the promoter, untranslated leader, and exonic coding sequences of hb, but to different extents. We discuss these results in terms of the known inter-specific differences in bcd and the potential coevolution of selected compensatory mutations in trans and cis in response to continuous promoter restructuring.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 407
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, MAKING FLY GENETICS
[2]   Comparison of bicoid-dependent regulation of hunchback between Musca domestica and Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Bonneton, F ;
Shaw, PJ ;
Fazakerley, C ;
Shi, M ;
Dover, GA .
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 66 (1-2) :143-156
[3]   Cooperative DNA-binding by Bicoid provides a mechanism for threshold-dependent gene activation in the Drosophila embryo [J].
Burz, DS ;
Rivera-Pomar, R ;
Jäckle, H ;
Hanes, SD .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1998, 17 (20) :5998-6009
[4]   Isolation of mutations that disrupt cooperative DNA binding by the Drosophila Bicoid protein [J].
Burz, DS ;
Hanes, SD .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 305 (02) :219-230
[5]   A SIMPLE LARVAL DIET FOR POPULATION STUDIES ON THE BLOWFLY LUCILIA-SERICATA (DIPTERA, CALLIPHORIDAE) [J].
DANIELS, S ;
SIMKISS, K ;
SMITH, RH .
MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY, 1991, 5 (03) :283-292
[6]   Reprogrammable recognition codes in Bicoid homeodomain-DNA interaction [J].
Dave, V ;
Zhao, C ;
Yang, F ;
Tung, CS ;
Ma, J .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 2000, 20 (20) :7673-7684
[7]  
Davidson E. H., 2001, Genomic regulatory systems: development and evolution
[8]   Developmental evolution: Axial patterning in insects [J].
Dearden, P ;
Akam, M .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (16) :R591-R594
[9]  
Dover G, 2000, BIOESSAYS, V22, P1153, DOI 10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12&lt
[10]  
1153::AID-BIES13&gt