Institutional sustainability indicators: An analysis of the institutions in agenda 21 and a draft set of indicators for monitoring their effectivity

被引:106
作者
Spangenberg, JH [1 ]
机构
[1] Sustainable Europe Res Inst Cologne, D-50676 Cologne, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1002/sd.184
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Objectives of sustainable development are defined for the economic, social and environmental dimension, but for effective compliance as well as for sustainability characteristics such as justice or participation they must be complemented by core institutional objectives. The CSD's set of sustainability indicators was the first one to explicitly take into account the institutional dimension of sustainability, and other organizations such as the World Bank and the OECD have followed. Like most pioneers, the indicators suggested offer significant room for improvement. In order to measure the effectiveness of the relevant institutions, Agenda 21 has been analysed regarding its institutional content (organizations, mechanisms, orientations). From this basis, the purposes of the institutions have been determined in a stepwise approach and indicators developed that permit us to measure the progress achieved against the purposes of the respective institution. The methodology developed can be applied to other international agreements, providing the basis for an integrated reporting system. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 115
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Crowards T., 1999, EC VULNERABILITY IND
[2]  
CZADA R, 1995, LEXIKON POLITIK, V1, P205
[3]  
Daly H. E., 1996, BEYOND GROWTH
[4]  
*FED GOV GERM, 1999, ERPR CSD NACHH DTSCH
[5]  
GOHLER G, 1997, LEVIATHAN SONDERHEFT, P21
[6]  
*IFOAM, 1998, BAS STAND
[7]  
*ILO, 1993, TRAD UN ENV SUST DEV
[8]  
LASS W, 1999, UMWELTBUNDESAMT TEXT, V36, P4
[9]  
LASS W, 1998, DISASTER VULNERABILI
[10]  
LENGYEL P, 1994, QUALITY LIFE EMERGEN