The impact of the congestion charging scheme on ambient air pollution concentrations in London

被引:87
作者
Atkinson, R. W. [1 ]
Barratt, B. [2 ]
Armstrong, B. [3 ]
Anderson, H. R. [1 ,2 ]
Beevers, S. D. [2 ]
Mudway, I. S. [2 ]
Green, D. [2 ]
Derwent, R. G. [4 ]
Wilkinson, P. [3 ]
Tonne, C. [3 ]
Kelly, F. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Div Community Hlth Sci, London SW17 0RE, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Environm Res Grp, MRC HPA Ctr Environm & Hlth, London WC2R 2LS, England
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1, England
[4] Rdscientific, Newbury, Berks, England
关键词
Congestion charge; Air pollution; London; TRANSPORT; SINGAPORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
On 17th February 2003, a congestion charging scheme (CCS), operating Monday-Friday, 07:00-18:00, was introduced in central London along with a programme of traffic management measures. We investigated the potential impact of the introduction of the CCS on measured pollutant concentrations (oxides of nitrogen (NO(X), NO and NO(2)), particles with a median diameter less than 10 microns (PM(10)), carbon monoxide (CO) and ozone (O(3))) measured at roadside and background monitoring sites across Greater London. Temporal changes in pollution concentrations within the congestion charging zone were compared to changes, over the same time period, at monitors unlikely to be affected by the CCS (the control zone) and in the boundary zone between the two. Similar analyses were done for CCS hours during weekends (when the CCS was not operating). Based on the single roadside monitor with the CCS Zone, it was not possible to identify any relative changes in pollution concentrations associated with the introduction of the scheme. However, using background monitors, there was good evidence for a decrease in NO and increases in NO(2) and O(3) relative to the control zone. There was little change in background concentrations of NO(X). There was also evidence of relative reductions in PM(10) and CO. Similar changes were observed during the same hours in weekends when the scheme was not operating. The causal attribution of these changes to the CCS per se is not appropriate since the scheme was introduced concurrently with other traffic and emissions interventions which might have had a more concentrated effect in central London. This study provides important pointers for study design and data requirements for the evaluation of similar schemes in terms of air quality. It also shows that results may be unexpected and that the overall effect on toxicity may not be entirely favourable. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5493 / 5500
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, CENTR LOND CONG CHAR
  • [3] Impact of changes in transportation and commuting behaviors during the 1996 Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta on air quality and childhood asthma
    Friedman, MS
    Powell, KE
    Hutwagner, L
    Graham, LM
    Teague, WG
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (07): : 897 - 905
  • [4] FULLER G, 2005, AIR QUALITY LONDON 2
  • [5] DAILY MORTALITY AND PM(10) POLLUTION IN UTAH VALLEY
    POPE, CA
    SCHWARTZ, J
    RANSOM, MR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1992, 47 (03): : 211 - 217
  • [6] Seik FT, 2000, CITIES, V17, P33
  • [7] *TRANSP LOND, 2004, CENTR LOND CONG CHAR
  • [8] Transport for London, 2007, CENTR LOND CONG CHAR
  • [9] Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2007, ONL TRANSP DEM MAN E
  • [10] The impact of a forced reduction in traffic volumes on urban air pollution
    Yuval
    Flicstein, Bernanda
    Broday, David M.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (03) : 428 - 440