Prospective comparison of prognostic values of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours with European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria in hepatocellular carcinoma following chemoembolisation

被引:87
作者
Kim, Beom Kyung [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Kim, Kyung Ah [3 ]
Park, Jun Yong [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Ahn, Sang Hoon [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Chon, Chae Yoon [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Han, Kwang-Hyub [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Kim, Seung Up [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Kim, Myeong-Jin [3 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Yonsei Inst Gastroenterol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[4] Liver Cirrhosis Clin Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Brain Korea 21 Project Med Sci, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
mRECIST; EASL; Overall survival; Prediction; Equivalence; LOCOREGIONAL THERAPY; MODIFIED RECIST; CANCER; SURVIVAL; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINE; EASL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Backgrounds: European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) guidelines, which measure changes in arterialised hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), differ in terms of number of target lesions (all versus <= 2) and calculation method (bidimensional versus unidimensional). We compared prognostic values of mRECIST for predicting overall survival (OS) with reference to EASL criteria in treatment-naive HCC undergoing trans-arterial chemoembolisation (TACE). Methods: The ability to predict OS during longitudinal follow-up was expressed as C-index, and a sample size of 292 patients was required to validate its equivalence between each criteria. Treatment responses were assessed using both guidelines 4 weeks after the first TACE, using dynamic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to explore differences in OS between responders (complete or partial) and non-responders (stable or progressive disease), defined by each method. Results: C-index for EASL and mRECIST guidelines was 0.753 and 0.759, respectively, demonstrating equivalence between two methods. Differences in median OS between responders and non-responders were statistically significant for both EASL (30.1 versus 18.7 months, p < 0.001) and mRECIST (33.8 versus 17.1 months, p < 0.001) guidelines. In addition to radiological response, a-fetoprotein (p < 0.001), tumour number (p < 0.001) and tumour size (p = 0.048) were significant predictors of OS. In multivariate analysis, radiological criteria, tumour number and alpha-fetoprotein were identified as independent predictors (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: mRECIST, a simpler method, provided prognostic values for predicting OS equivalent to EASL criteria in patients with HCC undergoing TACE as an initial treatment modality. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 834
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Added Value of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatobiliary Phase MR Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J].
Ahn, Sung Soo ;
Kim, Myeong-Jin ;
Lim, Joon Seok ;
Hong, Hye-Suk ;
Chung, Yong Eun ;
Choi, Jin-Young .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 255 (02) :459-466
[2]
Altman DG, 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429258589
[3]
[Anonymous], 2002, Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine
[4]
Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: A comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and multiphasic MDCT [J].
Baek, C. -K. ;
Choi, J. -Y. ;
Kim, K. -A. ;
Park, M. -S. ;
Lim, J. S. ;
Chung, Y. E. ;
Kim, M. -J. ;
Kim, K. -W. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (02) :148-156
[5]
Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma.: Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL Conference [J].
Bruix, J ;
Sherman, M ;
Llovet, JM ;
Beaugrand, M ;
Lencioni, R ;
Burroughs, AK ;
Christensen, E ;
Pagliaro, L ;
Colombo, M ;
Rodés, J .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 35 (03) :421-430
[6]
Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Update [J].
Bruix, Jordi ;
Sherman, Morris .
HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 53 (03) :1020-1022
[7]
Comparison of tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST in patients treated with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Edeline, Julien ;
Boucher, Eveline ;
Rolland, Yan ;
Vauleon, Elodie ;
Pracht, Marc ;
Perrin, Christophe ;
Le Roux, Catherine ;
Raoul, Jean-Luc .
CANCER, 2012, 118 (01) :147-156
[8]
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[9]
Evaluation of Tumor Response After Locoregional Therapies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Are Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Reliable? [J].
Forner, Alejandro ;
Ayuso, Carmen ;
Varela, Maria ;
Rimola, Jordi ;
Hessheimer, Amelia J. ;
Rodriguez de Lope, Carlos ;
Reig, Maria ;
Bianchi, Luis ;
Llovet, Josep M. ;
Bruix, Jordi .
CANCER, 2009, 115 (03) :616-623
[10]
EASL and mRECIST responses are independent prognostic factors for survival in hepatocellular cancer patients treated with transarterial embolisation [J].
Gillmore, Roopinder ;
Stuart, Sam ;
Kirkwood, Amy ;
Hameeduddin, Ayshea ;
Woodward, Nick ;
Burroughs, Andrew K. ;
Meyer, Tim .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 55 (06) :1309-1316