Parameter estimation in astronomy with Poisson-distributed data.: I.: The χγ2 statistic

被引:86
作者
Mighell, KJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Kitt Peak Natl Observ, Natl Opt Astron Observ, Tucson, AZ 85726 USA
关键词
methods : numerical; methods : statistical; X-rays : general;
D O I
10.1086/307253
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Applying the standard weighted mean formula, [Sigma(i) n(i) sigma(i)(-2)]/[Sigma(i)sigma(i)(-2)], to determine the weighted mean of data, n(i), drawn from a Poisson distribution, will, on average, underestimate the true mean by similar to 1 for all true mean values larger than similar to 3 when the common assumption is made that the error of the ith observation is sigma(i) = max(root n(i), 1). This small, but statistically significant offset, explains the long-known observation that chi-square minimization techniques which use the modified Neyman's chi(2) statistic, chi(N)(2) = Sigma(i) (n(i) - y(i))(2)/max(n(i), 1), to compare Poisson-distributed data with model values, y(i), will typically predict a total number of counts that underestimates the true total by about 1 count per bin. Based on my finding that the weighted mean of data drawn from a Poisson distribution can be determined using the formula [Sigma(i) [n(i) + min(n(i), 1)](n(i) + 1)(-1)]/[Sigma(i)(n(i) + 1)(-1)], I propose that a new chi(2) statistic, chi(gamma)(2) = Sigma(i)[n(i) + min(n(i), 1) - y(i)](2)/[n(i) + 1], should always be used to analyze Poisson-distributed data in preference to the modified Neyman's chi(2) statistic. I demonstrate the power and usefulness of chi(gamma)(2) minimization by using two statistical fitting techniques and five chi(2) statistics to analyze simulated X-ray power-law 15 channel spectra with large and small counts per bin. I show that chi(gamma)(2) minimization with the Levenberg-Marquardt or Powell's method can produce excellent results (mean slope errors less than or similar to 3%) with spectra having as few as 25 total counts.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 393
页数:14
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Abramowitz M., 1964, APPL MATH SERIES, V55
[2]  
Acton FS., 1970, NUMERICAL METHODS WO
[4]  
Bevington R., 1969, DATA REDUCTION ERROR
[5]  
CASH W, 1979, ASTROPHYS J, V228, P939, DOI 10.1086/156922
[6]   CONFIDENCE-LIMITS FOR SMALL NUMBERS OF EVENTS IN ASTROPHYSICAL DATA [J].
GEHRELS, N .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 303 (01) :336-346
[7]  
Gill M., 1981, Practical Optimization
[8]  
Levenberg K., 1944, Q APPL MATH, V2, P164, DOI [10.1090/QAM/10666, DOI 10.1090/QAM/10666]
[9]   AN ALGORITHM FOR LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATION OF NONLINEAR PARAMETERS [J].
MARQUARDT, DW .
JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR INDUSTRIAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1963, 11 (02) :431-441
[10]   On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference. Part II [J].
Neyman, J ;
Pearson, ES .
BIOMETRIKA, 1928, 20A :263-294