Complexity in the European party space: Exploring dimensionality with experts

被引:126
作者
Bakker, Ryan [2 ]
Jolly, Seth [1 ]
Polk, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Syracuse, NY 13104 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
dimensionality; European politics; expert surveys; party politics; INTEGRATION; COMPETITION; POSITIONS; ELECTIONS; MANIFESTOS; PARLIAMENT; POLITICS; SALIENCE; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1177/1465116512436995
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Does the n-issue space in domestic European polities reduce to one, two, or more dimensions? How do these dimensions relate to each other? More broadly, how does dimensionality vary across countries? We attempt to advance our understanding of political contestation in Europe by mapping the dimensionality of the political space across 24 countries using Chapel Hill expert survey (CHES) data. We test how well different models of the European political space fit the CHES data and find that three-dimensional models best fit the data in all countries. However, there is considerable cross-national variation in how the three dimensions relate to one another. Given this, we present a new measure of dimensional complexity that captures the degree to which these three dimensions are related. In so doing, we improve our understanding of the complexity of the political space in European countries.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 245
页数:27
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Adams James., 2005, UNIFIED THEORY PARTY
[2]   The multidimensional nature of party competition [J].
Albright, Jeremy J. .
PARTY POLITICS, 2010, 16 (06) :699-719
[3]  
Aldrich J. H., 1995, Why parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America
[4]  
Aldrich JohnH., 2007, PARTY PROCESS POLITI, V2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, TRANSFORMATION EUROP
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1989, STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice
[8]  
Anthony Downs., 1957, An economic theory of democracy
[9]  
Bakker R, 2008, FICKLE PARTIES CHANG
[10]   Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis [J].
Benoit, Kenneth ;
Laver, Michael .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2007, 26 (01) :90-107