Cystic Duct Stump Leaks After the Learning Curve

被引:16
作者
Eisenstein, Samuel [1 ]
Greenstein, Alexander J. [1 ]
Kim, Unsup [2 ]
Divino, Celia M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Elmhurst Hosp Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archsurg.143.12.1178
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To describe a series of patients who have had cystic duct stump leaks ( CDSLs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to compare the current presentation and management with that in previous studies. Design: Two-institution retrospective case series and review of the previously published literature. Setting: Two teaching hospitals. Patients: Twelve patients who had CDSLs of 5751 patients who underwent total laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Main Outcome Measures: Symptoms at presentation, laboratory values, imaging modalities, treatment modalities, and operative indications and techniques. Results: Between January 1, 1998, and March 31, 2007, 12 patients ( 0.21%) developed CDSLs a mean of 2.3 days postoperatively. Five patients ( 42%) were reported to have abnormal cystic ducts. A mean of 3 surgical clips were used for closure. Abdominal pain ( 58%) was the most common presenting symptom; 9 patients ( 75%) had an elevated white blood cell count, and 9 ( 75%) had abnormal liver function test results. Ten patients ( 83%) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ( ERCP), and 8 ( 67%) were definitively treated with ERCP stenting of the common bile duct. Two patients ( 17%) required adjunctive computed tomography guided drainage. There was 1 death. Conclusions: A CDSL can occur for a variety of reasons. Any patient with a postoperative picture consistent with a bile leak should undergo ERCP. If a CDSL is discovered, the common bile duct should be stented. Computed tomography-guided drainage is indicated if the patient does not improve after ERCP. Operative intervention should be reserved for the most serious of circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:1178 / 1183
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Bile duct leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy:: value of contrast-enhanced MRCP [J].
Aduna, M ;
Larena, JA ;
Martín, D ;
Martínez-Guereñu, B ;
Aguirre, I ;
Astigarraga, E .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2005, 30 (04) :480-487
[2]  
Agarwal Naresh, 2006, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, V5, P273
[3]  
BARTHEL J, 1995, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V90, P1322
[4]   Intraperitoneal bile collections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Causes, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment [J].
Braghetto, I ;
Bastias, J ;
Csendes, A ;
Debandi, A .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (11) :1037-1041
[5]   MANAGEMENT OF BILE LEAKS FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BROOKS, DC ;
BECKER, JM ;
CONNORS, PJ ;
CARRLOCKE, DL .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1993, 7 (04) :292-295
[6]  
Chen X., 1995, Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, V24, P312
[7]   Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in the management of postsurgical biliary leaks in patients with nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts [J].
Cozzi, G ;
Severini, A ;
Civelli, E ;
Milella, M ;
Pulvirenti, A ;
Salvetti, M ;
Romito, R ;
Suman, L ;
Chiaraviglio, F ;
Mazzaferro, V .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (03) :380-388
[8]   COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A NATIONAL SURVEY OF 4,292 HOSPITALS AND AN ANALYSIS OF 77,604 CASES [J].
DEZIEL, DJ ;
MILLIKAN, KW ;
ECONOMOU, SG ;
DOOLAS, A ;
KO, ST ;
AIRAN, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (01) :9-14
[9]  
Ferguson C M, 1992, Surg Laparosc Endosc, V2, P1
[10]  
Fujii T, 1998, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V45, P656