Accident prediction model for railway-highway interfaces

被引:159
作者
Oh, J [1 ]
Washington, SP
Nam, D
机构
[1] Korea Transport Inst, Koyang 411701, Kyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
railroad crossings; Poisson; gamma; negative binomial; international comparison;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.004
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Considerable past research has explored relationships between vehicle accidents and geometric design and operation of road sections, but relatively little research has examined factors that contribute to accidents at railway-highway crossings. Between 1998 and 2002 in Korea, about 95% of railway accidents occurred at highway-rail grade crossings, resulting in 402 accidents, of which about 20% resulted in fatalities. These statistics suggest that efforts to reduce crashes at these locations may significantly reduce crash costs. The objective of this paper is to examine factors associated with railroad crossing crashes. Various statistical models are used to examine the relationships between crossing accidents and features of crossings. The paper also compares accident models developed in the United States and the safety effects of crossing elements obtained using Korea data. Crashes were observed to increase with total traffic volume and average daily train volumes. The proximity of crossings to commercial areas and the distance of the train detector from crossings are associated with larger numbers of accidents, as is the time duration between the activation of warning signals and gates. The unique contributions of the paper are the application of the gamma probability model to deal with underdispersion and the insights obtained regarding railroad crossing related vehicle crashes. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 356
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Abbess C., 1981, Traffic Engineering & Control, V22, P535
[2]   An alternative accident prediction model for highway-rail interfaces [J].
Austin, RD ;
Carson, JL .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2002, 34 (01) :31-42
[3]  
BERG W, 1982, TRANSPORT RES REC, P847
[4]  
Cameron A.C., 1998, ANAL COUNT DATA
[5]  
*FED HIGHW ADM, 1986, FHWATS86215
[6]  
Federal Railroad Administration, 1996, HIGHW RAIL GRAD CROS
[7]  
Hauer E., 1988, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1185, P48
[8]  
HOPKINS JB, 1981, TSCFRA713 US DEP TRA
[9]   Explaining two-lane highway crash rates using land use and hourly exposure [J].
Ivan, JN ;
Wang, CY ;
Bernardo, NR .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2000, 32 (06) :787-795
[10]  
Joshua S., 1990, Transportation Planning and Technology, V15, P41, DOI DOI 10.1080/03081069008717439