Comparison of 3D Imaging and 2D Imaging for Performance Time of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

被引:69
作者
Bilgen, Koksal [1 ]
Ustun, Murat [2 ]
Karakahya, Murat [1 ]
Isik, Sevil [1 ]
Sengul, Serkan [3 ]
Cetinkunar, Suleyman [4 ]
Kucukpinar, Tevfik H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ordu Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, TR-52200 Ordu, Turkey
[2] Jinemed Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg 1, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Adana Training Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Adana, Turkey
关键词
gallstones; cholelithiasis; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; 3D imaging laparoscopy; 2D imaging laparoscopy; stereopsis; 3-DIMENSIONAL VISION; GALLSTONE DISEASE; BINOCULAR ENHANCEMENT; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; SYSTEMS; SYMPTOMS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827e17
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the Viking 3-dimensional (3D) system on performance time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Twenty-two patients were included in the study. The groups were standardized using a multiparameters filter (MPF) depending on preoperative ultrasonography and perioperative exploration findings. The 11 patients operated with the Viking 3D system (group A) were compared with 11 patients operated with the Olympus 2D/HD system (group B). Results: The mean performance time was 20.63 +/- 5.66 and 30.0 +/- 6.03 minutes in the group A (3D) and group B (2D), respectively (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The 3D imaging systems may cause a significant reduction in the performance time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 183
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System [J].
Byrn, John C. ;
Schluender, Stefanie ;
Divino, Celia M. ;
Conrad, John ;
Gurland, Brooke ;
Shlasko, Edward ;
Szold, Amir .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 193 (04) :519-522
[2]
BINOCULAR ENHANCEMENT OF VISUAL-ACUITY [J].
CAGENELLO, R ;
ARDITI, A ;
HALPERN, DL .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1993, 10 (08) :1841-1848
[3]
CAPOCACCIA L, 1984, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V119, P796
[4]
Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery [J].
Chan, ACW ;
Chung, SCS ;
Yim, APC ;
Lau, JYW ;
Ng, EKW ;
Li, AKC .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (05) :438-440
[5]
Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance [J].
Falk, V ;
Mintz, D ;
Grünenfelder, J ;
Farm, JI ;
Burdon, TA .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (11) :1282-1288
[6]
Three dimensional versus two dimensional imaging for laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Gurusamy, Kurinchi Selvan ;
Sahay, Samir ;
Davidson, Brian R. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (01)
[7]
Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones [J].
Halldestam, I ;
Enell, EL ;
Kullman, E ;
Borch, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (06) :734-738
[8]
Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Hanna, GB ;
Shimi, SM ;
Cuschieri, A .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9098) :248-251
[9]
Harweth RS, 2003, ADLERS PHYSL EYE, V2, P484
[10]
The 3-D monitor and head-mounted display - A quantitative evaluation of advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies [J].
Herron, DM ;
Lantis, JC ;
Maykel, J ;
Basu, C ;
Schwaitzberg, SD .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (08) :751-755