Impact of probe penetration on the electrical characterization of sub-50 nm profiles

被引:27
作者
Clarysse, T
Vanhaeren, D
Vandervorst, W
机构
[1] IMEC, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, INSYS, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
来源
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B | 2002年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1116/1.1432965
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The spreading resistance probe (SRP) and four point probe (FPP) use, respectively, two or four metal probes with loads in the range of 5-100 g to obtain indispensable information on the electrical characteristics (sheet resistance, junction depth, activation degree, profile shape) of impurity depth profiles in silicon. Recently, however, it has been reported that FPP sheet values are becoming irreproducible and that SRP depth profiles can be significantly shallower than the corresponding secondary ion mass spectrometry dopant profiles for ultrashallow structures. In this work we analyze the impact of probe penetration on the accuracy of SRP and FPP measurements for a series of sub-50 nm profiles with different steepness and substrate level. The probe penetration has been measured by atomic force microscopy and ranged from 5 to 130 nm. The FPP sheet resistance errors of up to 300%, as found for the higher loads, can be correlated with the penetration of the probes through the electrical junction taking into account material removal effects. Experimental data and simulations indicate that SRP raw data are relatively insensitive to probe penetration for source/drain implantation and diffusion profiles. Dependent on the structure involved, however, the SRP depth scale must be corrected for an offset due to probe penetration. (C) 2002 American Vacuum Society.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 466
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Aderhold W, 2000, 2000 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ION IMPLANTATION TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, P199, DOI 10.1109/IIT.2000.924124
[2]   THE RELATION BETWEEN 2-PROBE AND 4-PROBE RESISTANCES ON NONUNIFORM STRUCTURES [J].
ALBERS, J ;
BERKOWITZ, HL .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1984, 131 (02) :392-398
[3]  
*ASTM, 1984, F37484 ASTM
[4]   COMPARISON OF CARRIER PROFILES FROM SPREADING RESISTANCE ANALYSIS AND FROM MODEL-CALCULATIONS FOR ABRUPT DOPING STRUCTURES [J].
CASEL, A ;
JORKE, H .
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 1987, 50 (15) :989-991
[5]   Qualification of spreading resistance probe operations. II [J].
Clarysse, T ;
Vandervorst, W .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 2000, 18 (01) :381-388
[6]   Recent insights into the physical modeling of the spreading resistance point contact [J].
Clarysse, T ;
DeWolf, P ;
Bender, H ;
Vandervorst, W .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 1996, 14 (01) :358-368
[7]   Electrical characterization of ultrashallow dopant profiles [J].
Clarysse, T ;
Vandervorst, W ;
Collart, EJH ;
Murrell, AJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 147 (09) :3569-3574
[8]   A CONTACT MODEL FOR POISSON-BASED SPREADING RESISTANCE CORRECTION SCHEMES INCORPORATING SCHOTTKY-BARRIER AND PRESSURE EFFECTS [J].
CLARYSSE, T ;
VANDERVORST, W .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 1992, 10 (01) :413-420
[9]   Need to incorporate the real micro-contact distribution in spreading resistance correction schemes [J].
Clarysse, T ;
Vandervorst, W .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 2000, 18 (01) :393-400
[10]  
CLARYSSE T, UNPUB APPL PHYS LETT