Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography

被引:35
作者
Li, LH
Clark, RA
Thomas, JA
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Radiol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
breast neoplasms; diagnosis; breast radiography; technology; computers; diagnostic aid;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80290-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The authors developed and evaluated a method of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for mass detection with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Materials and Methods. The new CAD method for FFDM employs adaptive, nonlinear multiscale processing and hybrid classification methods. The major strategies are (a) to "standardize" the mammographic image before it is input to the analysis modules, (b) to adapt the segmentation of suspicious regions adapt to accommodate different characteristics of masses and mammograms, and (c) to use combined "hard" and "soft" decision making in discriminating between mass and normal tissue regions. Two data sets of diagnostic FFDM mammograms were used. The training data set includes 36 normal and 24 abnormal mammograms (34 masses), and the testing data set includes 24 normal and 10 abnormal mammograms. (10 masses). The tumors in this diagnostic database were more subtle and difficult to detect than those in screening databases the authors have used before. Results. With the limited database and a partial optimization, a sensitivity of 91% was obtained in training, with a false-positive rate of 3.21 per image. At this trained operating point of the CAD system, six of 10 subtle masses were detected in testing. Conclusion. The CAD algorithms developed in screen-film mammography can be modified for FFDM. More data analysis and system optimization and evaluation will be needed before CAD can be integrated efficiently into the performance of FFDM.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   NEW METHODS FOR IMAGING THE BREAST - TECHNIQUES, FINDINGS, AND POTENTIAL [J].
ADLER, DD ;
WAHL, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (01) :19-30
[2]   ANALYSIS OF CANCERS MISSED AT SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
BIRD, RE ;
WALLACE, TW ;
YANKASKAS, BC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) :613-617
[3]  
Black D, 1963, The Theory of Committees and Elections, V2nd
[4]   Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: An ROC study [J].
Chan, HP ;
Sahiner, B ;
Helvie, MA ;
Petrick, N ;
Roubidoux, MA ;
Wilson, TE ;
Adler, DD ;
Paramagul, C ;
Newman, JS ;
Sanjay-Gopal, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 212 (03) :817-827
[5]   Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations [J].
Elmore, G ;
Barton, MB ;
Moceri, VM ;
Polk, S ;
Arena, PJ ;
Fletcher, SW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (16) :1089-1096
[6]  
GIGER ML, 1993, SYLLABUS CATEGORICAL, P283
[7]  
KARSSEMEIJER N, 2001, 5 INT WORKSH DIG MAM, P243
[8]   EFFICACY OF SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY - A METAANALYSIS [J].
KERLIKOWSKE, K ;
GRADY, D ;
RUBIN, SM ;
SANDROCK, C ;
ERNSTER, VL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (02) :149-154
[9]  
Lewin J M, 1999, Diagn Imaging (San Franc), V21, P40
[10]  
LI L, P IEEE INT C IM PROC, P500