Characterization of Activity Landscapes Using 2D and 3D Similarity Methods: Consensus Activity Cliffs

被引:123
作者
Medina-Franco, Jose L. [1 ,2 ]
Martinez-Mayorga, Karina [1 ]
Bender, Andreas [3 ]
Marin, Ray M. [4 ]
Giulianotti, Marc A. [1 ]
Pinilla, Clemencia [5 ]
Houghten, Richard A. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Torrey Pines Inst Mol Studies, Port St Lucie, FL 34987 USA
[2] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Mexico City 14080, DF, Mexico
[3] Leiden Univ, Leiden Amsterdam Ctr Drug Res, Med Chem Div & Pharma IT Platform, NL-2333 CC Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Univ Nacl Colombia, Grp Quim Teor, Bogota, Colombia
[5] Torrey Pines Inst Mol Studies, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
关键词
MOLECULAR SIMILARITY; DATA-FUSION; CHEMISTRY; QSAR; VALIDATION; SEARCH; INDEX;
D O I
10.1021/ci800379q
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Activity landscape characterization has-been demonstrated to be a valuable tool in lead optimization, virtual screening, and computational modeling of active compounds. In this work, we present a general protocol to explore systematically the activity landscape of a lead series using 11 2D and 3D structural representations. As a test case we employed a set of 48 bicyclic guanidines (BCGs) with kappa-opioid receptor binding affinity, identified in our group. MACCS keys, graph-based three point pharmacophores, circular fingerprints, ROCS shape descriptors, and the TARIS approach, that compares structures based on molecular electrostatic potentials, were employed as orthogonal descriptors. Based on 'activity cliffs' common to a series of descriptors, we introduce the concept of consensus activity cliffs. Results for the current test case suggest that the presence or absence of a methoxybenzyl group may lead to different modes of binding for the active BCGs with the K-Opioid receptor. The most active compound (IC50 = 37 nM) is involved in a number of consensus cliffs making it a more challenge query for future virtual screening than would be expected from affinity alone. Results also reveal the importance of screening high density combinatorial libraries, especially in the "cliff-rich" regions of activity landscapes. The protocol presented here can be applied to other data sets to develop a consensus model of the activity landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 491
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SPOTF VERS 9 1 1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, M 196 1988 LOS ANG C
[3]   Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics [J].
Bender, A ;
Glen, RC .
ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY, 2004, 2 (22) :3204-3218
[4]   How Similar Are Similarity Searching Methods? A Principal Component Analysis of Molecular Descriptor Space [J].
Bender, Andreas ;
Jenkins, Jeremy L. ;
Scheiber, Josef ;
Sukuru, Sai Chelan K. ;
Glick, Meir ;
Davies, John W. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2009, 49 (01) :108-119
[5]   On scaffolds and hopping in medicinal chemistry [J].
Brown, Nathan ;
Jacoby, Edgar .
MINI-REVIEWS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 6 (11) :1217-1229
[6]  
*CEHM COMP GROUP I, MOL OP ENV MOE VERS
[7]   Pitfalls in QSAR [J].
Cronin, MTD ;
Schultz, TW .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE-THEOCHEM, 2003, 622 (1-2) :39-51
[8]   QSAR: dead or alive? [J].
Doweyko, Arthur M. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2008, 22 (02) :81-89
[9]   Reoptimization of MDL keys for use in drug discovery [J].
Durant, JL ;
Leland, BA ;
Henry, DR ;
Nourse, JG .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2002, 42 (06) :1273-1280
[10]   Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitations and novel approaches [J].
Eckert, Hanna ;
Bojorath, Juergen .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2007, 12 (5-6) :225-233