A comparison of commercial ethanol production systems from Brazilian sugarcane and US corn

被引:55
作者
Chum, Helena L. [1 ]
Warner, Ethan [1 ]
Seabra, Joaquim E. A. [2 ]
Macedo, Isaias C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR | 2014年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
sugarcane; corn; ethanol; trade; life cycle assessment; greenhouse gas; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY; BIOETHANOL; BIOENERGY; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.1448
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Global biofuels production grew rapidly from 2007 to 2012, led by the United States and Brazil, the world's two largest fuel-ethanol-producing systems. In this paper we provide insights into the characteristics of mature Brazilian sugarcane and maturing US dry mill corn ethanol industries. Both systems continue to improve as measured by life cycle data such as total renewable energy produced per unit of fossil energy consumed [renewable energy ratio (RER)]. Sugarcane self-benchmarking systems showed RER values of 7.0 in 2002 to 9.4 in 2009 as the industry started to switch to mechanized harvesting. The average US RER improved from 1.1 to 1.7 from 2000 to 2010. RERs of 4.4 to 5.5 are observed in corn ethanol plants employing natural gas or corn stover combined heat and power. Ethanol systems configured to produce ethanol and electricity had similar net energy balances (a ratio of net energy produced to energy contained in the fuel). One measure of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions (biomass use efficiency) compares the effectiveness of displacing carbon from combustion of fossil fuels with renewable carbon. Advanced corn ethanol systems reach higher GHG emission reduction levels compared to sugarcane ethanol by displacing coal-based electricity. Sugarcane systems achieve double the GHG emissions reductions per unit of harvested land relative to corn ethanol because sugarcane and corn are grown as perennial and annual crops in tropical and temperate climatic zones, respectively. Carbon dioxide capture and storage systems could offer additional GHG emission reductions for both corn and sugarcane ethanol systems. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 223
页数:19
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Renewable Fuel Standard
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT
[3]  
[Anonymous], TP090403A
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, RENEWABLES 2012 GLOB, P172
[5]  
[Anonymous], GREENH GAS REG EM EN
[6]   Explaining the experience curve: Cost reductions of Brazilian ethanol from sugarcane [J].
Bake, J. D. van den Wall ;
Junginger, M. ;
Faaij, A. ;
Poot, T. ;
Walter, A. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (04) :644-658
[7]  
Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Economico e Social (BNDES), 2008, Bioetanol da Cana-de-Acucar: Energia para o Desenvolvimento Sustentavel, V1
[8]   Implications of local lifecycle analyses and low carbon fuel standard design on gasohol transportation fuels [J].
Boies, Adam M. ;
McFarlane, Dane ;
Taff, Steven ;
Watts, Winthrop F. ;
Kittelson, David B. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (11) :7191-7201
[9]  
Brander M., 2011, Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management, V1, P161, DOI 10.1080/20430779.2011.637670
[10]  
Bruckner T, 2011, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT, P1002