Cultural differences in affective forecasting: The role of focalism

被引:49
作者
Lam, KCH [1 ]
Buehler, R
McFarland, C
Ross, M
Cheung, I
机构
[1] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Dept Psychol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[3] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
affective forecasting; impact bias; focalism; culture; holistic thought;
D O I
10.1177/0146167205274691
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The impact bias in affective forecasting-a tendency to overestimate the emotional consequences of future events-may not be a universal phenomenon. This prediction bias stems from a cognitive process known as focalism, whereby predictors focus attention narrowly on the upcoming target event. Three studies supported the hypothesis that East Asians, who tend to think more holistically than Westerners, would be less susceptible to focalism and, consequently, to the impact bias. In Studies 1 and 2, EuroCanadians exhibited the impact bias for positive future events, whereas East Asians did not. Although focus measure indicated that the cultural difference in prediction was mediated by the extent to which participants focused on the target event (i.e., focalism). In Study 3, a thought focus manipulation revealed that defocused Euro-Canadians and East Asians made equally moderate effective forecasts.
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1309
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[2]   BACK-TRANSLATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :185-216
[3]   Intensity bias in affective forecasting: The role of temporal focus [J].
Buehler, R ;
McFarland, C .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2001, 27 (11) :1480-1493
[4]   Cultural variations in optimistic and pessimistic bias: Do easterners really expect the worst and westerners really expect the best when predicting future life events? [J].
Chang, EC ;
Asakawa, K ;
Sanna, LJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (03) :476-491
[5]   Culture and judgment of causal relevance [J].
Choi, I ;
Dalal, R ;
Kim-Prieto, C ;
Park, H .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (01) :46-59
[6]   Cultural psychology of surprise: Holistic theories and recognition of contradiction [J].
Choi, I ;
Nisbett, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (06) :890-905
[7]  
Diener Ed., 1999, Well Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, P434
[8]   Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting [J].
Gilbert, DT ;
Pinel, EC ;
Wilson, TD ;
Blumberg, SJ ;
Wheatley, TP .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (03) :617-638
[9]  
Gilbert DT, 2002, EMO SOC BEH, P114
[10]   CULTURAL VARIATION IN UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM - DOES THE WEST FEEL MORE INVULNERABLE THAN THE EAST [J].
HEINE, SJ ;
LEHMAN, DR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 68 (04) :595-607