A comparative study of e-government XBRL implementations: The potential of improving information transparency and efficiency

被引:40
作者
Chen, Yu-Che [1 ]
机构
[1] No Illinois Univ, Div Publ Adm, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
关键词
e-Government; Implementation; Transparency; Financial information; XBRL; SBR; USER ACCEPTANCE; ADOPTION; ACCOUNTABILITY; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2012.05.009
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This study examines the e-government implementation of eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) to increase accountability and transparency in business and financial information. The business and financial information gathered in XBRL format is machine-readable and interoperable, thereby improving the ease of public dissemination and analysis. This study focuses on identifying and examining the determinants of successful XBRL implementation and draws from several bodies of literature: e-government. institutionalism, collaborative public management, regulatory compliance, and management information systems to identify determinants of successful implementation. This study selects four diverse implementations: the Netherlands. Australia. the United States, and Singapore. Empirical analysis follows a comparative case study method. The findings of this exploratory study underscore the importance of program goals and strategic alignment in achieving information transparency and efficiency, the advantage of strategies correlating to institutional setting, the critical need to provide incentives for adoption, and the usefulness of incremental implementation. The managerial and theoretical implications of these findings as well as future research opportunities are explored. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 563
页数:11
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Alles M., 2010, INT J ACCOUNTING INF
[2]  
Allison Graham., 1971, ESSENCE DECISION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
[4]  
[Anonymous], LONGITUDINAL ANAL VO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research
[6]  
Baker N., 2008, HOLLAND TAKES DIFFER
[7]   The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e-Government [J].
Bannister, Frank ;
Connolly, Regina .
POLICY AND INTERNET, 2011, 3 (01)
[8]  
Bardach E., 1996, The state of public management, P168
[9]   Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies [J].
Bertot, John C. ;
Jaeger, Paul T. ;
Grimes, Justin M. .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2010, 27 (03) :264-271
[10]  
Bharosa N., 2011, DG O 11 12 ANN INT C