A comparative evaluation of heuristic and bivariate statistical modelling for landslide susceptibility mappings in Ghurmi-Dhad Khola, east Nepal

被引:59
作者
Bijukchhen, Subeg Man [1 ]
Kayastha, Prabin [2 ,3 ]
Dhital, Megh Raj [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tribhuvan Univ, Cent Dept Geol, Kathmandu, Nepal
[2] Tribhuvan Univ, Mt Risk Engn Unit, Kathmandu, Nepal
[3] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Hydrol & Hydraul Engn, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Landslide; Susceptibility; GIS; Heuristic; Bivariate statistical index; Nepal; HAZARD EVALUATION; ZONATION; FUZZY;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-012-0569-7
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Landslides are one of the major natural disasters that occur in the Himalayan range with recurring frequency, causing enormous loss of life and property every year. Preparation of landslide inventory maps and landslide susceptibility zonation maps are the important tasks to be taken into account initially for safe mitigation measures. The present paper focuses on landslide susceptibility maps of the Ghurmi-Dhad Khola area, east Nepal, using Geographic Information System. For this purpose, the landslide susceptibility maps are prepared by using the heuristic and bivariate statistical methods. The parameters considered for the study are slope angle, slope aspect, elevation, distance from drainage, geology, land cover, rock and soil type, and distance from faults and folds. The landslide susceptibility zonation map produced from the heuristic method shows that 42.59 % of the observed landslide falls under the very high susceptible zone and 33.00 % under the high susceptible zone. Likewise, the landslide susceptibility zonation map produced from the bivariate method depicts that 44.19 % of the observed landslide falls under the very high susceptible zone and 31.59 % under the high susceptible zone. Both the landslide susceptibility zonation maps are identical, and success rates of both the maps are above 80 %. While comparing the landslide susceptibility maps obtained from two different methods, about 78 % of the study area falls in the identical susceptible zones. Special attention should be taken into consideration for the construction works in the areas which have been spatially agreed as very high and high susceptible zones from both techniques. Moreover, these maps can be used for slope management, land use planning, disaster management planning, etc., by the concerned authorities.
引用
收藏
页码:2727 / 2743
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Aleotti P., 1999, Bull Eng Geol Environ, V58, P21, DOI [10.1007/s100640050066, DOI 10.1007/S1006-40050-066, DOI 10.1007/S100640050066]
[2]   LANDSLIDE HAZARD EVALUATION AND ZONATION MAPPING IN MOUNTAINOUS TERRAIN [J].
ANBALAGAN, R .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 1992, 32 (04) :269-277
[3]  
Brabb E. E., 1984, IV International Symposium on Landslides [Canadian Geotechnical Society]., P307
[4]  
CARRARA A, 1995, ADV NAT TECHNOL HAZ, V5, P135
[5]  
Chung CJF, 1999, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V65, P1389
[6]  
Deoja B., 1991, Mountain Risk Engineering Handbook, P875
[7]   Rock slope instability assessment using spatially distributed structural orientation data in Darjeeling Himalaya (India) [J].
Ghosh, Saibal ;
Guenther, Andreas ;
Carranza, Emmanuel John M. ;
van Westen, Cees J. ;
Jetten, Victor G. .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2010, 35 (15) :1773-1792
[8]   A quantitative approach for improving the BIS (Indian) method of medium-scale landslide susceptibility [J].
Ghosh, Saibal ;
van Westen, C. J. ;
Carranza, E. J. M. ;
Ghoshal, T. B. ;
Sarkar, N. K. ;
Surendranath, M. .
JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2009, 74 (05) :625-638
[9]  
Gorsevski P.V., 2003, J GEOGR SYST, V5, P223, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10109-003-0113-0, 10.1007/s10109-003-0113-0]
[10]   Approaches for comparative evaluation of raster GIS-based landslide susceptibility zonation maps [J].
Gupta, R. P. ;
Kanungo, D. P. ;
Arorac, M. K. ;
Sarkar, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2008, 10 (03) :330-341