Improved Bias Correction Techniques for Hydrological Simulations of Climate Change

被引:259
作者
Pierce, David W. [1 ]
Cayan, Daniel R. [1 ,2 ]
Maurer, Edwin P. [3 ]
Abatzoglou, John T. [4 ]
Hegewisch, Katherine C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, Div Climate Atmospher Sci & Phys Oceanog, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, La Jolla, CA USA
[3] Santa Clara Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Santa Clara, CA 95053 USA
[4] Univ Idaho, Dept Geog, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
关键词
Physical Meteorology and Climatology; Atmosphere-land interaction; Climate change; Hydrometeorology; Mathematical and statistical techniques; Bias; Statistical techniques; Models and modeling; Model errors; LAND-SURFACE FLUXES; PRECIPITATION CHANGES; UNITED-STATES; MODEL; TEMPERATURE; CMIP5; DATASET;
D O I
10.1175/JHM-D-14-0236.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Global climate model (GCM) output typically needs to be bias corrected before it can be used for climate change impact studies. Three existing bias correction methods, and a new one developed here, are applied to daily maximum temperature and precipitation from 21 GCMs to investigate how different methods alter the climate change signal of the GCM. The quantile mapping (QM) and cumulative distribution function transform (CDF-t) bias correction methods can significantly alter the GCM's mean climate change signal, with differences of up to 2 degrees C and 30% points for monthly mean temperature and precipitation, respectively. Equidistant quantile matching (EDCDFm) bias correction preserves GCM changes in mean daily maximum temperature but not precipitation. An extension to EDCDFm termed PresRat is introduced, which generally preserves the GCM changes in mean precipitation. Another problem is that GCMs can have difficulty simulating variance as a function of frequency. To address this, a frequency-dependent bias correction method is introduced that is twice as effective as standard bias correction in reducing errors in the models' simulation of variance as a function of frequency, and it does so without making any locations worse, unlike standard bias correction. Last, a preconditioning technique is introduced that improves the simulation of the annual cycle while still allowing the bias correction to take account of an entire season's values at once.
引用
收藏
页码:2421 / 2442
页数:22
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014, V80, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Union, DOI DOI 10.1029/2007EO470006
[3]   Precipitation characteristics in eighteen coupled climate models [J].
Dai, Aiguo .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (18) :4605-4630
[4]  
DALY C, 1994, J APPL METEOROL, V33, P140, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033<0140:ASTMFM>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate [J].
Deser, Clara ;
Knutti, Reto ;
Solomon, Susan ;
Phillips, Adam S. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 2 (11) :775-779
[7]   Advanced spectral methods for climatic time series [J].
Ghil, M ;
Allen, MR ;
Dettinger, MD ;
Ide, K ;
Kondrashov, D ;
Mann, ME ;
Robertson, AW ;
Saunders, A ;
Tian, Y ;
Varadi, F ;
Yiou, P .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2002, 40 (01) :3-1
[8]   Impact of a Statistical Bias Correction on the Projected Hydrological Changes Obtained from Three GCMs and Two Hydrology Models [J].
Hagemann, Stefan ;
Chen, Cui ;
Haerter, Jan O. ;
Heinke, Jens ;
Gerten, Dieter ;
Piani, Claudio .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2011, 12 (04) :556-578
[9]  
IPCC, 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report, P3056, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844.005, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
[10]  
Jenkins G.M., 1969, Spectral Analysis and Its Applications