An exploratory multilevel analysis of income, income inequality and self-rated health of the elderly in China

被引:57
作者
Feng, Zhixin [1 ]
Wang, Wenfei Winnie [1 ]
Jones, Kelvyn [1 ]
Li, Yaqing
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol BS8 1SS, Avon, England
关键词
China; Health of elderly; Income; Income inequality; Multilevel modelling; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; REGIONAL INEQUALITY; INDIVIDUAL INCOME; REPORTED HEALTH; UNITED-STATES; OLDEST-OLD; MORTALITY; MODELS; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.028
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In the last three decades. China has experienced rapid economic development and growing economic inequality, such that economic disparities between rural and urban areas, as well as coastal and interior areas have deepened. Since the late 19905 China has also experienced an ageing population which has attracted attention to the wellbeing of the rapidly growing number of elderly. This research aims to characterise province differences in health and to explore the effects of individual income and economic disparity in the form of income inequality on health outcomes of the elderly. The study is based on the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey data collected in 2008 for 23 provinces. Multilevel logistic models are employed to investigate the relationship between income, income inequality and self-rated health for the elderly using both individual and province-level variables. Results are presented as relative odds ratios, and for province differentials as Median Odds Ratios. The analysis is deliberately exploratory so as to find evidence of income effects if they exist and particular attention is placed on how province-level inequality (contemporaneous and lagged) may moderate individual relationships. The results show that the health of the elderly is not only affected by individual income (the odds of poor health are 3 times greater for the elderly with the lowest income compared to those at the upper quartile) but also by a small main effect for province-level income inequality (odds ratio of 1.019). There are significant cross-level interactions such that where inequality is high there are greater differences between those with and without formal education, and between men and women with the latter experiencing poorer health. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2481 / 2492
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, WORLD POP PROSP
[2]  
[Anonymous], MANUAL MLWIN V2 1 S
[3]   The shape of the relationship between income and mortality in the United States - Evidence from the national longitudinal mortality study [J].
Backlund, E ;
Sorlie, PD ;
Johnson, NJ .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 6 (01) :12-20
[4]   Consequences of Unmodeled Nonlinear Effects in Multilevel Models [J].
Bauer, Daniel J. ;
Cai, Li .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2009, 34 (01) :97-114
[5]  
Bell A., 2012, Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects modelling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data
[6]   No association of income inequality with adult mortality within New Zealand: a multi-level study of 1.4 million 25-64 year olds [J].
Blakely, T ;
Atkinson, J ;
O'Dea, D .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2003, 57 (04) :279-284
[7]   What is the lag time between income inequality and health status? [J].
Blakely, TA ;
Kennedy, BP ;
Glass, R ;
Kawachi, I .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 54 (04) :318-319
[8]   The effects of regional characteristics on alcohol-related mortality -: a register-based multilevel analysis of 1.1 million men [J].
Blomgren, J ;
Martikainen, P ;
Mäkelä, P ;
Valkonen, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2004, 58 (12) :2523-2535
[9]   A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models [J].
Browne, William J. ;
Draper, David .
BAYESIAN ANALYSIS, 2006, 1 (03) :473-513
[10]   For whom is income inequality most harmful? A multi-level analysis of income inequality and mortality in Norway [J].
Dahl, Espen ;
Elstad, Jon Ivar ;
Hofoss, Dag ;
Martin-Mollard, Melissa .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (10) :2562-2574