Development of novel renewable energy based hydrogen production systems: A comparative study

被引:44
作者
Dincer, I. [1 ]
Ratlamwala, T. A. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Inst Technol, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Cu-Cl cycle; HyS cycle; Quintuple flash; Heliostat field; Hydrogen production; Exergy; Efficiency; WESTINGHOUSE SULFUR CYCLE; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; EXERGY ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2012.08.029
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper focuses on a comparative study of five renewable energy based hydrogen production systems. These five systems considered in this regard are (a) Cu-Cl integrated with Kalina cycle (system 1), (b) hybrid sulfur (HyS) cycle integrated with isobutane cycle (system 2), (c) quintuple flash power plant integrated with electrolyzer (system 3), (d) heliostat field integrated with steam cycle, Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and electrolyzer (system 4), and (d) solar photo-voltaic/thermal (PV/T) integrated with triple effect absorption cooling system and electrolyzer (system 5). The results obtained here show that energy efficiencies of these five systems are not affected by the rise in ambient temperature. It is also found that among these five systems studied, system I performs the best and system 5 ends with the worst. The energy and exergy efficiencies, sustainability index, and energy required to produce unit L/s of hydrogen for system 1 are found to be 59%, 83%, 5.9, and 16.58 kW, respectively. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 87
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Integrated gasification and Cu-Cl cycle for trigeneration of hydrogen, steam and electricity [J].
Aghahosseini, S. ;
Dincer, I. ;
Naterer, G. F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (04) :2845-2854
[2]  
Akyuz E, 2012, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG
[3]   OPTIMIZATION OF A DOUBLE-STAGE FLASH SYSTEM [J].
ALICILAR, A ;
DOGAN, M ;
GURU, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 1995, 19 (02) :169-179
[4]  
Alkhamis AI, 1997, INT J ENERG RES, V21, P823, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-114X(199707)21:9<823::AID-ER303>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-Q
[6]   Geothermal-based hydrogen production using thermochemical and hybrid cycles: A review and analysis [J].
Balta, M. Tolga ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Hepbasli, Arif .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2010, 34 (09) :757-775
[7]   Heat recovery from Diesel engines: A thermodynamic comparison between Kalina and ORC cycles [J].
Bombarda, Paola ;
Invernizzi, Costante M. ;
Pietra, Claudio .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 30 (2-3) :212-219
[8]   WESTINGHOUSE SULFUR CYCLE FOR THERMOCHEMICAL DECOMPOSITION OF WATER [J].
BRECHER, LE ;
SPEWOCK, S ;
WARDE, CJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 1977, 2 (01) :7-15
[9]   Hydrogen production by the Westinghouse cycle: modelling and optimization of the two-phase electrolysis cell [J].
Charton, S. ;
Rivalier, P. ;
Ode, D. ;
Morandini, J. ;
Caire, J. P. .
ELECTROCHEMICAL PROCESS SIMULATION III, 2009, 65 :11-22
[10]   Solar hydrogen production by the Hybrid Sulfur process [J].
Corgnale, Claudio ;
Summers, William A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (18) :11604-11619