Human Variation in Overriding Attentional Capture

被引:274
作者
Fukuda, Keisuke [1 ]
Vogel, Edward K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; VISUAL-ATTENTION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NEURAL MECHANISMS; TOP-DOWN; CONTINGENT; OBJECTS;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2145-09.2009
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Attention can be directed either voluntarily based on the goals of the individual or involuntarily "captured" by salient stimuli in the immediate environment. Although involuntary capture is a critical means of directing attention, the completion of many common tasks requires our ability to ignore salient, but otherwise irrelevant stimuli while restricting our attention to stimuli that are related to our goals. Here, we report neurophysiological measures of spatial attention in humans that gauge an individual's ability to resist attentional capture from salient but irrelevant information. By measuring the rapid reallocation of spatial attention immediately after the onset of distractors, we observe that the ability to override attentional capture varies substantially across individuals and is strongly predicted by the specific working memory capacity of each person. High-capacity individuals were much more capable of resisting attentional capture than low-capacity individuals, who involuntarily reallocated spatial attention when distractors were present in the display. These results provide evidence that the poor attentional abilities associated with low memory capacity may stem from an inability to override attentional capture in the initial moments after the onset of distracting information.
引用
收藏
页码:8726 / 8733
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention [J].
Berger, A ;
Henik, A ;
Rafal, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2005, 134 (02) :207-221
[2]   Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation [J].
Bleckley, MK ;
Durso, FT ;
Crutchfield, JM ;
Engle, RW ;
Khanna, MM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (04) :884-889
[3]   IMPLICATIONS OF SUSTAINED AND TRANSIENT CHANNELS FOR THEORIES OF VISUAL-PATTERN MASKING, SACCADIC SUPPRESSION, AND INFORMATION-PROCESSING [J].
BREITMEYER, BG ;
GANZ, L .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1976, 83 (01) :1-36
[4]   Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices [J].
Buschman, Timothy J. ;
Miller, Earl K. .
SCIENCE, 2007, 315 (5820) :1860-1862
[5]   On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes [J].
Cowan, N ;
Elliott, EM ;
Saults, JS ;
Morey, CC ;
Mattox, S ;
Hismjatullina, A ;
Conway, ARA .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 51 (01) :42-100
[7]   Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].
Moore, Tirin ;
Zirnsak, Marc .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72
[8]   Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects [J].
Drew, Trafton ;
Vogel, Edward K. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (16) :4183-4191
[9]   THE STRUCTURE OF ATTENTION CONTROL - CONTINGENT ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE BY APPARENT MOTION, ABRUPT ONSET, AND COLOR [J].
FOLK, CL ;
REMINGTON, RW ;
WRIGHT, JH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1994, 20 (02) :317-329
[10]   Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink [J].
Folk, CL ;
Leber, AB ;
Egeth, HE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2002, 64 (05) :741-753