Constructivism: A naturalistic methodology for nursing inquiry

被引：47

作者：

Appleton, JV ^{[1
]}

King, L ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV LONDON KINGS COLL, DEPT NURSING STUDIES, LONDON WC2R 2LS, ENGLAND

来源：

ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE | 1997年 / 20卷 / 02期

关键词：

constructivism; naturalistic inquiry; nursing research; philosophy;

D O I：

10.1097/00012272-199712000-00003

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

This article will explore the philosophical underpinnings of the constructivist research paradigm. Despite its increasing popularity in evaluative health research studies there is limited recognition of constructivism in popular research texts. Lincoln and Guba's original approach to constructivist methodology is outlined and a detailed framework for nursing research is offered. Fundamental issues and concerns surrounding this methodology are debated and differences between method and methodology are highlighted.

引用

页码：13 / 22

页数：10

共 28 条

[1] ANALYZING QUALITATIVE INTERVIEW DATA - ADDRESSING ISSUES OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY [J].

APPLETON, TV .

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1995, 22 (05) :993-997

[2]

Bullock A., 1977, The Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought

[3]

COWLEY S, 1996, HLTH VISITOR, V69, P17

[4]

Denzin N., 1994, LANDSCAPE QUALITATIV

[5]

Erlandson D.A., 1993, Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods

[6]

Guba E.G., 1989, 4 GENERATION EVALUAT

[7]

Guba E.G., 1981, EFFECTIVE EVALUATION

[8]

GUBA EC, 1990, PARADIGM DIALOG, P17

[9]

GUBA EG, 1982, ECTJ-EDUC COMMUN TEC, V30, P233

[10]

HABERMAS Jurgen., 1976, LEGITIMATION CRISIS

← 1 2 3 →