Cow-Calf Producer Preferences for Voluntary Traceability Systems

被引:62
作者
Schulz, Lee L. [1 ]
Tonsor, Glynn T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Food & Resource Econ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Animal traceability; cattle producer; cow-calf; National Animal Identification System; voluntary traceability; CONTINGENT VALUATION; HETEROGENEOUS PREFERENCES; BEEF INDUSTRY; CHEAP TALK; CATTLE; IDENTIFICATION; CONSUMERS; LESSONS; DEMAND; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00226.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This article identifies preferences of US cow-calf producers for voluntary traceability systems to better identify the potential success of alternative voluntary traceability systems. Results suggest that notable heterogeneity exists between cow-calf producers in their preferences and the welfare effects of mandating traceability adoption. Producers are sensitive to price, managing entity and information requirements. We provide forecasts of voluntary participation rates under different price premium and discount scenarios that producers may face. This analysis has policy implications as success of voluntary traceability systems hinges critically upon cow-calf producer preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 162
页数:25
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[2]   Stated preferences for imported and hormone-treated beef: application of a mixed logit model [J].
Alfnes, F .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 31 (01) :19-37
[3]  
BAILEY D, 2004, AAEA ANN M DENV CO 1
[4]  
Bailey D, 2007, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V32, P403
[5]   THE EFFECT OF COMMON SOURCES OF REGRESSION ERROR ON BENEFIT ESTIMATES [J].
BOCKSTAEL, NE ;
STRAND, IE .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1987, 63 (01) :11-20
[6]   Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach [J].
Boxall, PC ;
Adamowicz, WL .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 23 (04) :421-446
[7]  
Boyle K.J., 2003, PRIMER NONMARKET VAL, P111
[8]  
BUHR BL, 2003, 035 INT AGR TRAD RES
[9]  
*CATTL NETW, 2008, 5 MIN DR J WIEM USDA
[10]   Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method [J].
Cummings, RG ;
Taylor, LO .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :649-665