Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique

被引:160
作者
Lingeman, James E. [1 ]
McAteer, James A. [2 ]
Gnessin, Ehud [1 ]
Evan, Andrew P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Methodist Hosp, Inst Kidney Stone Dis, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
EXTRACORPOREALLY INDUCED DESTRUCTION; PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL; DUAL-PULSE LITHOTRIPTER; NEW-ONSET HYPERTENSION; INDUCED RENAL INJURY; TO-STONE DISTANCE; IN-VITRO; KIDNEY-STONES; URETERAL CALCULI; COMMINUTION EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1038/nrurol.2009.216
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学]; 100221 [泌尿外科学];
摘要
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is the only noninvasive method for stone removal. Once considered as a primary option for the treatment of virtually all stones, SWL is now recognized to have important limitations that restrict its use. In particular, the effectiveness of SWL is severely limited by stone burden, and treatment with shock waves carries the risk of acute injury with the potential for long-term adverse effects. Research aiming to characterize the renal response to shock waves and to determine the mechanisms of shock wave action in stone breakage and renal injury has begun to suggest new treatment strategies to improve success rates and safety. Urologists can achieve better outcomes by treating at slower shock wave rate using a step-wise protocol. The aim is to achieve stone comminution using as few shock waves and at as low a power level as possible. Important challenges remain, including the need to improve acoustic coupling, enhance stone targeting, better determine when stone breakage is complete, and minimize the occurrence of residual stone fragments. New technologies have begun to address many of these issues, and hold considerable promise for the future.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 670
页数:11
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]
Lower pole I: A prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis - Initial results [J].
Albala, DM ;
Assimos, DG ;
Clayman, RV ;
Denstedt, JD ;
Grasso, M ;
Gutierrez-Aceves, J ;
Kahn, RI ;
Leveillee, RJ ;
Lingeman, JE ;
Macaluso, JN ;
Munch, LC ;
Nakada, SY ;
Newman, RC ;
Pearle, MS ;
Preminger, GM ;
Teichman, J ;
Woods, JR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2072-2080
[2]
[Anonymous], 2007, Campbell-Walsh Urology
[3]
BERNSTEIN MJ, 1988, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V260, P977
[4]
Hit/miss monitoring of ESWL by spectral Doppler ultrasound [J].
Bohris, C ;
Bayer, T ;
Lechner, C .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 29 (05) :705-712
[5]
The search for cavitation in vivo [J].
Carstensen, EL ;
Gracewski, S ;
Dalecki, D .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 26 (09) :1377-1385
[6]
INFLUENCE OF WATER CONDUCTIVITY ON THE EFFICIENCY AND THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF ELECTROHYDRAULIC SHOCK-WAVE GENERATION [J].
CATHIGNOL, D ;
MESTAS, JL ;
GOMEZ, F ;
LENZ, P .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 17 (08) :819-828
[7]
Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones? [J].
Chacko, J ;
Moore, M ;
Sankey, N ;
Chandhoke, PS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04) :1370-1373
[8]
In vitro study of ultrasound based real-time tracking of renal stones for shock wave lithotripsy: Part 1 [J].
Chang, CC ;
Liang, SM ;
Pu, YR ;
Chen, CH ;
Manousakas, I ;
Chen, TS ;
Kuo, CL ;
Yu, FM ;
Chu, ZF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (01) :28-32
[9]
CHAUSSY C, 1980, LANCET, V2, P1265
[10]
1ST CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH EXTRACORPOREALLY INDUCED DESTRUCTION OF KIDNEY-STONES BY SHOCK-WAVES [J].
CHAUSSY, C ;
SCHMIEDT, E ;
JOCHAM, D ;
BRENDEL, W ;
FORSSMANN, B ;
WALTHER, V .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 127 (03) :417-420