The mass of the Milky Way: Limits from a newly assembled set of halo objects

被引:162
作者
Sakamoto, T [1 ]
Chiba, M
Beers, TC
机构
[1] Grad Univ Adv Studies, Dept Astron Sci, Tokyo 1818588, Japan
[2] Natl Astron Observ, Tokyo 1818588, Japan
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Galaxy : halo; Galaxy : fundamental parameters; Galaxy : kinematics and dynamics; stars : horizontal-branch;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:20021499
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We set new limits on the mass of the Milky Way, making use of the latest kinematic information for Galactic satellites and halo objects. Our sample consists of 11 satellite galaxies, 137 globular clusters, and 413 field horizontal-branch (FHB) stars up to distances of 10 kpc from the Sun. Roughly half of the objects in this sample have measured proper motions, permitting the use of their full space motions in our analysis. In order to bind these sample objects to the Galaxy, their rest-frame velocities must be lower than their escape velocities at their estimated distances. This constraint enables us to show that the mass estimate of the Galaxy is largely affected by several high-velocity objects (Leo I, Pal 3, Draco, and a few FHB stars), not by a single object alone ( such as Leo I), as has often been the case in past analyses. We also find that a gravitational potential that gives rise to a declining rotation curve is insufficient to bind many of our sample objects to the Galaxy; a possible lower limit on the mass of the Galaxy is about 2.2 x 10(12) M.. To be more quantitative, we adopt a Bayesian likelihood approach to reproduce the observed distribution of the current positions and motions of the sample, in a prescribed Galactic potential that yields a flat rotation curve. This method enables a search for the most likely total mass of the Galaxy, without undue influence in the final result arising from the presence or absence of Leo I, provided that both radial velocities and proper motions are used. Although the best mass estimate depends somewhat on the model assumptions, such as the unknown prior probabilities for the model parameters, the resultant systematic change in the mass estimate is confined to a relatively narrow range of a few times 10(11) M., owing to our consideration of many FHB stars. The most likely total mass derived from this method is 2.5(-1.0)(+0.5) x + 10(12) M. (including Leo I), and 1.8(-0.7)(+04) 10(12) M. (excluding Leo I). The derived mass estimate of the Galaxy within the distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud (similar to50 kpc) is essentially independent of the model parameters, yielding 5.5(-0.2)(+0.0) x 10(11) M. (including Leo I) and 5.4(-0.4)(+0.1) x 10(11) M. (excluding Leo I). Implications for the origin of halo microlensing events (e.g., the possibility of brown dwarfs as the origin of the microlensing events toward the LMC, may be excluded by our lower mass limit) and prospects for more accurate estimates of the total mass are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 911
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   The MACHO project: Microlensing results from 5.7 years of Large Magellanic Cloud observations [J].
Alcock, C ;
Allsman, RA ;
Alves, DR ;
Axelrod, TS ;
Becker, AC ;
Bennett, DP ;
Cook, KH ;
Dalal, N ;
Drake, AJ ;
Freeman, KC ;
Geha, M ;
Griest, K ;
Lehner, MJ ;
Marshall, SL ;
Minniti, D ;
Nelson, CA ;
Peterson, BA ;
Popowski, P ;
Pratt, MR ;
Quinn, PJ ;
Stubbs, CW ;
Sutherland, W ;
Tomaney, AB ;
Vandehei, T ;
Welch, D .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 542 (01) :281-307
[2]   Direct detection of a microlens in the Milky Way [J].
Alcock, C ;
Allsman, RA ;
Alves, DR ;
Axelrod, TS ;
Becker, AC ;
Bennett, DP ;
Cook, KH ;
Drake, AJ ;
Freeman, KC ;
Geha, M ;
Griest, K ;
Keller, SC ;
Lehner, MJ ;
Marshall, SL ;
Minniti, D ;
Nelson, CA ;
Peterson, BA ;
Popowski, P ;
Pratt, MR ;
Quinn, PJ ;
Stubbs, CW ;
Sutherland, W ;
Tomaney, AB ;
Vandehel, T ;
Welch, D .
NATURE, 2001, 414 (6864) :617-619
[3]   Proper motion of the Large Magellanic Cloud using QSOs as an inertial reference system [J].
Anguita, C ;
Loyola, P ;
Pedreros, MH .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 120 (02) :845-854
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Galactic astronomy: Structure and kinematics
[5]   Kinematics of metal-poor stars in the galaxy. II. Proper motions for a large nonkinematically selected sample [J].
Beers, TC ;
Chiba, M ;
Yoshii, Y ;
Platais, I ;
Hanson, RB ;
Fuchs, B ;
Rossi, S .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 119 (06) :2866-2881
[6]  
Binney J., 2008, Galactic Dynamics
[7]   A SURVEY OF PROPER-MOTION STARS .5. EXTREME-VELOCITY STARS AND THE LOCAL GALACTIC ESCAPE VELOCITY [J].
CARNEY, BW ;
LATHAM, DW ;
LAIRD, JB .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 96 (02) :560-566
[8]   On the existence of differences in luminosity between horizontal branch stars in globular clusters and in the field [J].
Carretta, E ;
Gratton, RG ;
Clementini, G .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 316 (04) :721-728
[9]   Distances, ages, and epoch of formation of globular clusters [J].
Carretta, E ;
Gratton, RG ;
Clementini, G ;
Pecci, FF .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 533 (01) :215-235
[10]   A proper motion study of the globular cluster M 10 [J].
Chen, L ;
Geffert, M ;
Wang, JJ ;
Reif, K ;
Braun, JM .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2000, 145 (02) :223-228