Classifying local disease recurrences after breast conservation therapy based on location and histology - New primary tumors have more favorable outcomes than true local disease recurrences

被引:188
作者
Huang, E
Buchholz, TA
Meric, F
Krishnamurthy, S
Mirza, NQ
Ames, FC
Feig, BW
Kuerer, HM
Ross, MI
Singletary, SE
McNeese, MD
Strom, EA
Hunt, KK
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
breast conservation therapy; local disease recurrence; new primary tumor; histology;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.10952
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
BACKGROUND. To distinguish true local recurrences (TR) from new primary tumors (NP) and to assess whether this distinction has prognostic value in patients who develop ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. METHODS. Between 1970 and 1994, 1339 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center for ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma. Of these patients, 139 (10.4%) had an IBTR as the first site of failure. For the 126 patients with clinical data available for retrospective review, we classified the lBTR as a TR if it was located within 3 cm of the primary tumor bed and was of the same histologic subtype. All other IBTRs were designated NP. RESULTS. Of the 126 patients, 48 (38%) patients were classified as NP and 78 (62%). as TR. Mean time to disease recurrence was 7.3 years for NP versus 5.6 years for TR (P = 0.0669). The patients with NP had improved 10-year rates of overall survival (NP 77% vs. TR 46%, P = 0.0002), cause-specific survival (NP 83% vs. TR 49%, P = 0.0001), and distant disease-free survival (NP 77% vs. TR 26%, P < 0.0001). Patients with NP more often developed contralateral breast carcinoma (10-year rate: NP 29% vs. TR 8%, P = 0.0043), but were less likely to develop a second local recurrence after salvage treatment of the first IBTR (NP 2% vs. TR 18%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS. Patients with NP had significantly better survival rates than those with TR, but were more likely to develop contralateral breast carcinoma. Distinguishing new breast carcinomas from local disease recurrences may have importance in therapeutic decisions and chemoprevention strategies. This is because patients with new carcinomas had significantly lower rates of metastasis than those with local disease recurrence, but were more likely to develop contralateral breast carcinomas. (C) 2002 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2059 / 2067
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Impact of systemic treatment on local control for patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer treated with breast-conservation therapy [J].
Buchholz, TA ;
Tucker, SL ;
Erwin, J ;
Mathur, D ;
Strom, EA ;
McNeese, MD ;
Hortobagyi, GN ;
Cristofanilli, M ;
Esteva, FJ ;
Newman, L ;
Singletary, SE ;
Buzdar, AU ;
Hunt, KK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (08) :2240-2246
[2]
Family history and treatment outcome in young women after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer [J].
Chabner, E ;
Nixon, A ;
Gelman, R ;
Hetelekidis, S ;
Recht, A ;
Bornstein, B ;
Connolly, J ;
Schnitt, S ;
Silver, B ;
Manola, J ;
Harris, J ;
Garber, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (06) :2045-2051
[3]
BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer [J].
Couch, FJ ;
DeShano, ML ;
Blackwood, MA ;
Calzone, K ;
Stopfer, J ;
Campeau, L ;
Ganguly, A ;
Rebbeck, T ;
Weber, BL ;
Jablon, L ;
Cobleigh, MA ;
Hoskins, K ;
Garber, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (20) :1409-1415
[4]
Dalberg K, 1998, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V82, P2204, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980601)82:11<2204::AID-CNCR15>3.3.CO
[5]
2-J
[6]
SIGNIFICANCE OF IPSILATERAL BREAST-TUMOR RECURRENCE AFTER LUMPECTOMY [J].
FISHER, B ;
ANDERSON, S ;
FISHER, ER ;
REDMOND, C ;
WICKERHAM, DL ;
WOLMARK, N ;
MAMOUNAS, EP ;
DEUTSCH, M ;
MARGOLESE, R .
LANCET, 1991, 338 (8763) :327-331
[7]
Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: Report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study [J].
Fisher, B ;
Costantino, JP ;
Wickerham, DL ;
Redmond, CK ;
Kavanah, M ;
Cronin, WM ;
Vogel, V ;
Robidoux, A ;
Dimitrov, N ;
Atkins, J ;
Daly, M ;
Wieand, S ;
Tan-Chiu, E ;
Ford, L ;
Wolmark, N .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (18) :1371-1388
[8]
Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-positive tumors [J].
Fisher, B ;
Dignam, J ;
Bryant, J ;
DeCillis, A ;
Wickerham, DL ;
Wolmark, N ;
Costantino, J ;
Redmond, C ;
Fisher, ER ;
Bowman, DM ;
Deschenes, L ;
Dimitrov, NV ;
Margolese, RG ;
Robidoux, A ;
Shibata, H ;
Terz, J ;
Paterson, AHG ;
Feldman, MI ;
Farrar, W ;
Evans, J ;
Lickley, HL .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (21) :1529-1542
[9]
8-YEAR RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING TOTAL MASTECTOMY AND LUMPECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT IRRADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
FISHER, B ;
REDMOND, C ;
POISSON, R ;
MARGOLESE, R ;
WOLMARK, N ;
WICKERHAM, L ;
FISHER, E ;
DEUTSCH, M ;
CAPLAN, R ;
PILCH, Y ;
GLASS, A ;
SHIBATA, H ;
LERNER, H ;
TERZ, J ;
SIDOROVICH, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (13) :822-828
[10]
Germ-line BRCA1 mutations in Jewish and non-Jewish women with early-onset breast cancer [J].
FitzGerald, MG ;
MacDonald, DJ ;
Krainer, M ;
Hoover, I ;
ONeil, E ;
Unsal, H ;
SilvaArrieto, S ;
Finkelstein, DM ;
BeerRomero, P ;
Englert, C ;
Sgroi, DC ;
Smith, BL ;
Younger, JW ;
Garber, JE ;
Duda, RB ;
Mayzel, KA ;
Isselbacher, KJ ;
Friend, SH ;
Haber, DA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (03) :143-149